wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

, , ,

US Patent Office denies GPT trademark to OpenAI

OpenAI argued that common use of the term GPT could lead to ‘infringement issues’ wherein users are likely to assume that products with the ‘GPT’ in their names are associated with ChatGPT.

Open AI’s application to trademark the term ‘GPT’ has been denied by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for being too general.

According to the USPTO, by trademarking the term ‘GPT’, which is an acronym for ‘Generative Pre-trained Transformers’, OpenAI’s competitors would be unable to accurately describe their product.

What did OpenAI say

In its application, OpenAI argued that its chatbot ChatGPT popularised the term ‘GPT’. They said that ‘GPT’ is not simply a general descriptive term. It is unlikely that users would know the definition of  ‘Generative Pre-trained Transformers’ as a “neural network model that gives applications the ability to create human-like text and content and answer questions in a conversational manner.”

Instead, they argued that a model tagged ‘GPT’ is commonly understood to be a model with ‘ask and answer functions’ to generate information. This owing to the term’s association with ChatGPT’s much more popular ‘ask and answer model.’

They believe that the common use of the term GPT could lead to ‘infringement issues’ and ‘inhibit competition’ in the market, wherein users are likely to assume that products with the ‘GPT’ in their names are associated with ChatGPT.

What did the USPTO say 

In response to OpenAI’s arguments, the USPTO said that ‘GPT’ “merely describes a feature, function, or characteristic of applicant’s goods and services.”

“The fact that consumers may not know the underlying words of the acronym [GPT] does not alter the fact that relevant purchasers are adapted to recognizing that the term “GPT” is commonly used in connection with software to identify a particular type of software that features this AI ask and answer technology. Accordingly, this argument is not persuasive.”

They stated that using the term ‘GPT’ or ‘Generative Pre-trained Transformers’ would be necessary to describe a product accurately, like software featuring neural network models. Evidence from the internet for the same was also shared.

Further, they stated that OpenAI was unable to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the term ‘GPT’ was being used in a fashion that could be classified as infringement.

What does this mean for OpenAI

OpenAI has another opportunity to appeal for a trademark. This would require them to give adequate proof of ‘GPT’ being used as a non-descriptive word for commercial gain.

This is the second time OpenAI’s application has been denied. They had previously applied in December 2022 and were denied in May 2023.


STAY ON TOP OF TECH NEWS: Our daily newsletter with the top story of the day from MediaNama, delivered to your inbox before 9 AM. Click here to sign up today!


Also Read:

Written By

Free Reads

News

The ‘Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act’ (RISAA) is a legislation to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

News

In its submission, the Interior Ministry said the decision to impose a ban was "made in the interest of upholding national security, maintaining public...

News

Among other things, the security requirements include data encryption and regular review and updated access permissions to reflect personnel changes.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.

Views

News

NPCI CEO Dilip Asbe recently said that what is not written in regulations is a no-go for fintech entities. But following this advice could...

News

Notably, Indus Appstore will allow app developers to use third-party billing systems for in-app billing without having to pay any commission to Indus, a...

News

The existing commission-based model, which companies like Uber and Ola have used for a long time and still stick to, has received criticism from...

News

Factors like Indus not charging developers any commission for in-app payments and antitrust orders issued by India's competition regulator against Google could contribute to...

News

Is open-sourcing of AI, and the use cases that come with it, a good starting point to discuss the responsibility and liability of AI?...

You May Also Like

News

Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

Advert

135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...

News

By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

News

Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Name:*
Your email address:*
*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ