wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Deadline extended for comments: TRAI’s paper on regulation of messaging and calling apps

For the scope of the consultation paper, messaging and calling applications are services that facilitate real-time person-to-person telecommunication services

Update: The deadline comments and counter comments from stakeholders on the ‘Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services’ consultation paper was extended to August 18, 2023 and September 01, 2023 respectively, as per a press release from the Ministry of Communications.

Comments/ counter comments may be sent to Shri Akhilesh Kumar Trivedi, Advisor (Network, Spectrum & Licensing), TRAI, at advmn@trai.gov.in

Original post, July 10, 2023:

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) released a consultation paper discussing regulatory mechanisms for Over-The-Top (OTT) communication services (like Whatsapp and Telegram) and the selective banning of these services on July 7. The paper seeks to address a back reference by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) from 2022. In this back-reference, it asked TRAI to reconsider the lack of regulation for messaging and calling applications. It also asked it to recommend a policy for the selective banning of OTT services during periods of unrest/crisis that are likely to be used by terrorists/anti-national elements.

For the scope of the consultation paper, messaging and calling applications are services that facilitate real-time person-to-person telecommunication services, similar to those provided by traditional telecom service providers.

What more did the DoT say in its back-dated reference:

DoT’s back-dated reference contains a copy of its discussion with the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communication and Information Technology on the subject of “suspension of telecom services/internet and its impact.” In this discussion, the committee said that “it will be of great relief if the Department [DoT] can explore the option of banning selective services, such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram, etc., instead of banning the internet as a whole.” This, it says, will “allow financial services, health, education, and various other services to continue to operate for business as usual, thereby minimizing inconvenience and suffering to the general public.”

MediaNama’s take: With the selective banning of services becoming feasible, it would become easier for the government to conduct internet shutdowns, thereby making them more rampant – which, in turn, would negatively affect people’s freedom of speech and expression. 

Issues up for consultation:

  1. What should be the definition of messaging and calling apps, and how should these services be classified? 
  2. What should be the definition of messaging and calling services? Please provide a list of features that may comprehensively characterize these services. 
  3. What could be the reasonable classification of messaging and calling services? Please provide a list of the categories of these communication services based on such classification. 
  4. Provide your views on the following aspects of messaging and calling apps as compared to telecom services: regulatory aspects; economic aspects; security aspects; privacy aspects; safety aspects; quality of service aspects and consumer grievance redressal aspects. 
  5. Is there a need to bring messaging and calling apps under any licensing/regulatory framework to promote a competitive landscape for the benefit of consumers and service innovation?
  6. In case it is decided to bring messaging and calling apps under a licensing/ regulatory framework, what licensing/ regulatory framework(s) would be appropriate for the various classes of messaging and calling apps (as discussed in question 4)?
  7. Is there a need for a collaborative framework between these app providers and licensed TSPs? If yes, what should be the provisions of such a collaborative framework?
  8. What could be the potential challenges arising out of the collaborative framework between these service providers and TSPs?
  9. What are the technical challenges in selectively banning specific messaging and calling services and websites in specific regions of the country for a specific period? Also, suggest ways to mitigate these challenges. 
  10. Is there a need to put in place a regulatory framework for the selective banning of these services under the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017, or any other law, in force? And if such a regulatory framework is decided upon, what classes of messaging and calling would be covered under this framework, and what would be the mechanisms for such a framework?
  11. Is there a need for the selective ban of websites apart from messaging and calling services? If yes, which class(es) of websites should be included?
  12. Are there any other relevant issues or suggestions related to regulatory mechanisms for messaging and calling apps and selective banning of these services?

TRAI has invited written comments from stakeholders on the issues mentioned above by 4th August 2023 and counter comments by 18th August 2023.  


STAY ON TOP OF TECH POLICY: Our daily newsletter with the top story of the day from MediaNama, delivered to your inbox before 9 AM. Click here to sign up today!


Also read:

 

Written By

Free Reads

News

"We believe the facts and the law are clearly on our side, and we will ultimately prevail," the company said on the enactment of...

News

Zuckerberg expressed confidence in monetizing AI through methods like ads and paid access to larger models, leveraging Meta's successful history with scaled technologies.

News

The data leakage comes on the same day as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) restricted Kotak Mahindra Bank from onboarding customers over online/mobile...

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.

Views

News

NPCI CEO Dilip Asbe recently said that what is not written in regulations is a no-go for fintech entities. But following this advice could...

News

Notably, Indus Appstore will allow app developers to use third-party billing systems for in-app billing without having to pay any commission to Indus, a...

News

The existing commission-based model, which companies like Uber and Ola have used for a long time and still stick to, has received criticism from...

News

Factors like Indus not charging developers any commission for in-app payments and antitrust orders issued by India's competition regulator against Google could contribute to...

News

Is open-sourcing of AI, and the use cases that come with it, a good starting point to discuss the responsibility and liability of AI?...

You May Also Like

News

Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

Advert

135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...

News

By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

News

Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Name:*
Your email address:*
*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ