wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Facebook’s Ajit Mohan a no-show at Delhi Peace and Harmony committee hearing, gets ‘final warning’

Facebook refused to send anyone to appear before the Delhi Assembly’s Peace and Harmony Committee, which had scheduled a hearing on Tuesday afternoon. The Committee had earlier issued summons to Facebook India chief Ajit Mohan, who was called to depose on the company’s alleged role in inciting hatred and aiding violence during the Northeast Delhi riots earlier this year.

In its last hearing on September 1, the Committee had found Facebook prima facie guilty of aggravating the riots, and suggested that a supplemental chargesheet be filed against the company in ongoing cases related to the riots.

The Committee has been hearing on the allegations of political bias against Facebook to look at how non-enforcement of community standards could have played a role in the Delhi violence. Constituted in March 2020 after the riots, the Committee took up the matter after the Wall Street Journal reported last month that Facebook had refused to take down hate speech posted by leaders of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.

Speaking on occasion, Committee chairman and Aam Aadmi Party MLA Raghav Chadha noted that Mohan had been issued a notice of summons on September 10. “However, with great sadness I inform you that Facebook has chosen to respond to the notice by sending a letter, which reached us on September 14 [Monday],” he said. The letter was sent by Vikram Langa, a director at Facebook India.

The letter, read out aloud by Chadha, noted that issues regarding the dissemination of hate speech were currently being considered by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology, where the company has given testimony already. It also said the regulation of intermediaries such as Facebook fell under the authority of the Central government. Furthermore, the subject of law and order — related to the violence in Delhi — was also exclusive domain of the Central government. Facebook requested that the Committee recall its notice to Mohan.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Committee says Facebook’s actions in breach of Assembly’s privilege

Chadha and other members criticised Facebook for refusing to attend the hearing, and said the company was in breach of the privileges afforded to the Delhi Legislative Assembly, its committees and members.

Chadha dismissed the implication that the Committee had no powers to hear on the given matters. “Whoever gave Facebook legal advice is not well informed. Firstly, just because a Parliamentary committee is hearing something, it doesn’t mean a Delhi Assembly committee can’t hear on the same thing. After all, we are a federal polity.” Secondly, he added, the parliamentary committee wasn’t even hearing about Facebook’s role in the Delhi riots, but rather on “safeguarding citizens and prevention of misuse of social/online news media platforms”.

“This not just an insult and contempt against the Delhi Assembly itself, but of the two crore people of Delhi who have elected it.” said Chadha. He added that by refusing to appear in front of the Committee, Facebook was trying to conceal the truth. “The accused is telling us we like the Parliamentary committee more than we like you and we want to appear before them. I don’t know what kind of protection they are getting there,” he said.

Other members present at the event included AAP MLAs BS Joon, Jarnail Singh and Abdul Rehman. Singh said, “It is strange that a private company is telling a committee formed by a legislative body that ‘you don’t have the right to call us’. Facebook has challenged the authority of the house.” Joon called Facebook’s letter “unfortunate, vague and evasive” and said the company was “duty-bound” to explain to the Committee about the allegations made against it with relation to the Delhi riots.

Chadha said Mohan would be given one last chance to appear before it, and that if he doesn’t come, the Committee could begin legal proceedings against him. He said that the Committee would, in the form of one more letter, tell Mohan that his refusal is a breach of privilege, and could lead to a warrant against him.

Read more:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.


Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ