wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Anonymity on Telegram makes it a ‘safe haven’ for illegal activities, says Kerala Police: Report

Credit: Soumyarendra Barik

The Kerala police told the Kerala High Court that it is nearly impossible for it to trace users on messaging service Telegram because of the “anonymity” and “security” the app provides, the Times of India reported. The police argued that Telegram made it difficult for it to gather users’ account details as users can use the service by using just a user ID, while hiding their mobile number, unlike WhatsApp, the report said.

As the phone number is hidden, law enforcement agencies cannot collect account details from service providers either. The app has become a “safe haven” to carry out “illegal activities,” due to the anonymity it provides, the police reportedly argued. Telegram should be made to abide by regional laws to operate in India, and a system should be created so that the platform can respond to queries on criminal matters, it further said.

Kerala Police’s filed its arguments in an affidavit in response to a petition by Athena Solomon, that seeks to block user access to Telegram and to delete all pornography channels, groups and bots on the platform, the report said. Kerala Police Cyberdome and the state’s DGP are among the respondents in the case, along with the Union of India, government of Kerala, Department of Telecommunications, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and the official in-charge.

Anonymity is a big concern for the police: Users on the app can conceal their identities from admins of groups and send texts, videos or other files “anonymously,” the police said in its affidavit; and the fact that Telegram’s servers are hosted outside of India and the platform’s owners have not provided any support to law enforcement agencies in Kerala, also add to the police’s problems. It doesn’t provide any help to law enforcement agencies like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger do, the police said, and demanded that Telegram put up servers in India, the report said.

Police further argued that the platform, “which provides end-to-end encryption,” is used to propagate illegal content such as child pornography, carry out financial fraud, sell credit/debit card details and also for movie piracy, according to The Indian Express. However, readers should note that Telegram, unlike WhatsApp or Signal, doesn’t provide end-to-end encryption by default.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The petition that called for banning Telegram: Solomon, a student at the National Law School of India University (NLSIU) Bengaluru, in a petition filed on October 1, had called for a ban on Telegram claiming that it is widely used for transmission of sexually explicit and vulgar content of women and children. It also claimed that the app is used by paedophile groups to circumvent the ban on child porn in India. It further said:

  • It doesn’t have an office, or even a nodal officer, in India.
  • Law enforcement agencies cannot make any sense of the Telegram data they receive from ISPs because they don’t have the encryption keys to Telegram.
  • The use of bots ensures that the identity of the user is not revealed, so it gets difficult to trace who is promoting child pornography and terrorism.

Telegram’s troubles in India: 

  • Telegram refused to hand over chat details of the ISIS module Ansar-ul-Khilafah Kerala despite several queries from the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
  • Several Indian ISPs sporadically blocked access to Telegram’s web version — not the app — over the past year:

  • In December 2018, in response to a customer complaint, JioCare tweeted, “The website [Telegram Web] has been indefinitely blocked as per the instructions received from the government.”
  • In February 2019, the Internet Freedom Foundation reported that Reliance Jio was blocking the messaging service’s web domain.
  • In April 2019, we reported that Jio and Hathaway (in which Reliance owns a majority share through subsidiaries) had blocked Telegram Web in several states. The website, when accessed on a Jio or Hathaway network, read, “Your requested URL has been blocked as per the directions received from Department of Telecommunications, Government of India.”

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Do we have an enabling system for the National Data Governance Framework Policy (NDGFP) aiming to create a repository of non-personal data?


A viewpoint on why the regulation of cryptocurrencies and crypto exchnages under 2019's E-Commerce Rules puts it in a 'grey area'


India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...


There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data


Existing consumer protection regulations are not sufficient to cover the extent of protection that a crypto-investor would require.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ