wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Sacred Games: Petitioner demands online content regulatory board after Netflix refuses to censor dialogue

Nikhil Bhalla, the advocate petitioning to remove certain dialogues from Netflix’s Sacred Games, has now amended his petition to ask the government to create a regulatory board for online streaming companies. Bhalla confirmed the amendment to MediaNama. The next hearing for this case will be held on October 20.

The Indian government is examining regulating online content through an IT Ministry committee, after an online content regulation committee set up by the I&B Ministry was disbanded. In July, we reported that the I&B Ministry had disbanded its online content regulation committee, which was set up in April by former I&B Minister Smriti Irani. Following a cabinet reshuffle, Rajyavardhan Rathore took over from Irani, leading the ministry to switch to a softer tone on regulating online content. An RTI filing by Medianama revealed that the committee hadn’t met even once.

Read:
Some Video on Demand cos want to create a regulatory content code before the government does it
As India looks to regulate Internet content, some issues to consider

A timeline of the case

  • On 8 August, Chander Lal, the senior advocate representing Netflix, told the Delhi HC, “My instructions are that we don’t want to change the word.” The judges hearing the case were quoted as saying during arguments, “Nobody is pressing or forcing you. You take your own decision, whether you want to change the word or not. We are not going to compel you.”
  • In the 16 July hearing, Netflix told the court that it had replaced the English subtitle for the Hindi word ‘fattu’, now translated as ‘wimp’, used to describe the former Prime Minister. That change had been made before the petition was filed in the Court.
  • On 11 July, advocate and petitioner Nikhil Bhalla filed a PIL in the Delhi HC asking for certain scenes to be deleted from the Netflix Sacred Games series. Bhalla said that these scenes were “derogatory to former PM Rajiv Gandhi.” In one line, for instance, the character Ganesh Gaitonde calls Rajiv Gandhi a wimp in Hindi, which a previous version of the subtitles translated as ‘pussy’. Bhalla petitioned for the scenes with such dialogue to be removed. The petitioners had to justify that the PIL was in public interest.

 

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.

Views

News

By Rahul Rai and Shruti Aji Murali A little less than a year since their release, the Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules, 2020 is being amended....

News

By Anand Venkatanarayanan                         There has been enough commentary about the Indian IT...

News

By Rahul Rai and Shruti Aji Murali The Indian antitrust regulator, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has a little more than a decade...

News

By Stella Joseph, Prakhil Mishra, and Surabhi Prabhudesai The recent difference of opinions between the Government and Twitter brings to fore the increasing scrutiny...

News

This article is being posted here courtesy of The Wire, where it was originally published on June 17.  By Saksham Singh The St Petersburg paradox,...

You May Also Like

News

The UIDAI’s request comes in the wake of recently proposed amendments to the Cinematograph Act which would give the government powers that are making filmmakers...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Name:*
Your email address:*
*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ