wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

GuestPost: How Mobile Music Revenues Are Split In India

A senior executive from the content industry, on condition of anonymity, sent us the following inputs on how revenues are split between the telecom operator and content aggregators/owners, following our coverage of Airtels claim of being India’s largest music company and the TRAI clamping down on the Press Star (*) to Copy service:

You need to understand that the two most important music distribution applications on mobile are:
1. CRBT (Caller Ring Back Tone/Hello Tune/Caller Tune etc)
2. MoD (Music on Demand)

There is no issue with handset compatibility and both these apps are piracy proof. They play as stream from the telecom operator servers and are never downloaded/stored on the handset – hence no piracy.

The ringtones market is almost but dead, plagued by issues of  piracy/search/content discovery. Cost of promotion of ringtones is more than the revenue.

For the two successful applications (CRBT/MoD), the revenue comes in two ways:

1. Monthly subscription – many combinations, from Re. 1/day to Rs. 30/month.
2. Actual usage/activation – when user actually selects the CRBT or listens to the music/songs.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

For CRBT it is anywhere from Rs 10-15 per activation and for music it is 30 p/min to Re. 1/min. The subscription money is shared between the platform owner (OnMobile/Cellebrum/Bharti Telesoft etc) and Telecom Operator, and the content owner rarely gets any money.

The Content Owner/aggregator gets a revenue share on the usage/activation – anywhere from 15%-35% depending on negotiating power/skills (in that order 😉

Best Case Scenaro

Now take an example of where the user subscribes to the CRBT service and changes the tone once every month the revenue will be:
1. 12*30 = Rs. 360
2. 12*15 = Rs. 180
Total Revenue = Rs. 540

In best case scenario the content owner/aggregator gets 35% of 180 = Rs 63. That is hardly 12% of telco topline.

Worst Case Scenario

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Now imagine the worst case scenario where the user changes the CRBT only once in the year (which is the typical case as the user can’t listen to his own CRBT owing to the very nature of the application). The calculation:
1. 12*30 = Rs. 360
2. 1*15 = Rs. 15
Total Revenue = Rs. 375

The Revenue Share to the Content Owner/ Content Provider = Rs. 5.25  (1.5% of the Topline of Telco).

Also on the Press (*) to Copy bit – why not enable Pound(#) to Unsubscribe to ensure the services can be unsubscribed easily?

(ED: What’s your take? In case you disagree, or have a different structuring of deals to offer, please do share)


If you have an opinion or details to share with our readers, please do send across your contribution at nikhil AT medianama DOT com. However, please bear in mind that the selection of posts for publishing is a subjective decision, and we may request you for changes. We do publish anonymous guest posts, but exercise significant discretion while doing so.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

— Airtel Claims To Be India’s Largest Music Company; We Do The Math
— On TRAIs Directive Limiting Content Subscriptions; A Case For Licensing VAS In India
— Your Take On TRAI’s Directive Limiting Content Subscriptions
— Motorola To Sell Soundbuzz; Exiting MotoMusic In Most Markets

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Amazon announced that it will integrate its logistics network and SmartCommerce services with the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC).


India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?


After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples


In the case of the ‘deemed consent' provision in the draft data protection law, brevity comes at the cost of clarity and user protection


The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ