Home » , , , ,

Update: Files Sharing Sites Blocked In India Because Reliance BIG Pictures Got A Court Order

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Share on LinkedIn4Share on Reddit3Email this to someone

Update (August 1st 2011): Torrentfreak reports that Reliance Entertainment has also sent an email to Bittorrent site BitSnoop, asking it to comply with the court order (via @apar), requesting BitSnoop to also put a notice on its homepage, notifying its users to not download or upload the movie Singham. BitSnoop’s owners have said that they’re not governed by Indian law, and don’t need to adhere to the court order. A copy of the John Doe order is also available online, here (hat tip: Apar Gupta). The Singham torrent, apparently, is “doing well“.

MediaNama readers should bear in mind that sites received or accessed in a country could well be governed by its laws, because the content is consumed there. However, this situation explains why Reliance Entertainment contacted ISPs, because they control user access to web sites.


July 21st, 2011: File sharing websites have been blocked in India since yesterday on some ISPs because Reliance BIG Pictures got a “John Doe” order allowing them to service cease and desist notices on movie pirates pirating the film Singham, Mahesh Rangathantan, COO at Reliance Entertainment, told MediaNama. Singham is releasing in theatres tomorrow. What is unique about this order through, according to Big Pictures VP (Music and Anti Piracy) Sanjay Tandon, is that it also covers Internet Service Providers, and not just people selling pirated DVDs or cable operators. “A John Doe order is given against unidentified people, because the copyright owner doesn’t know who is going to infringe. We anticipate that certain entities are going to infringe, and the Delhi High Court has granted us a John Doe order,” Tandon said.

Yesterday, Airtel Broadband users reported that several file sharing websites like MediaFire had been inaccessible,and a notice was displayed, stating that the site has been blocked on request of Department of Telecom. A traceroute search suggested that the block was instituted at Flag Telecom. Our readers also indicated that with certain other ISPs – Zylog and MTNL Triband – the file sharing sites were not accessible.

Tandon said that the order doesn’t necessitate blocking an entire website, but only that ISPs should not make the film Singham accessible: the order only pertains to the access of the film. “Our only appeal with this order is that you cannot make the film available through your network. It’s a matter for the ISPs to look into,because it becomes their liabiltiy.”

Our Take: What About The Rights Of The Customer?

So here is what appears to have happened: the court order apparently allows Reliance Big Pictures to ask ISPs to ensure that Singham isn’t pirated, and since the only the ISPs cannot ensure or monitor individual instances of piracy, they appear to have gone ahead and blocked the filesharing sites, probably deciding that it’s better to be safe than sorry, and ended up throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

This reminds me of the 2006 blogger block, wherein instead of blocking sub-domain pages, on orders of DoT, the ISPs completely blocked blogger, typepad etc.

In this case, by blocking access to these sites, the ISPs appear to have ensured blocking of legitimate file sharing as well.

What can be done about it? Frankly, I don’t know. The question that you have to ask yourself is – as a customer of an ISP, what are your rights, and is the ISP liable for preventing your access to the world wide web? The court order in this case apparently doesn’t direct ISPs to block filesharing sites in their entirety. By going beyond the apparent mandate of the court order, aren’t your rights being infringed upon? What gives an ISP the freedom to do that?

Unfortunately, unless someone takes an ISP to court, I suppose we will never know.

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Share on LinkedIn4Share on Reddit3Email this to someone

  • Subvolatile

    god dam my family escaped from china to live free in india and now india is slowly becoming like china i think i will move to canada now.  limited freedom is no freedom at all.  and by the way who wants  to see that god dam movie it is a sham,

  • Ashok KP

    thank god, i think reliance themselves has lifted the block. i can access those sites now using my reliance datacard.

  • me

    john doe  it is the first order of it’s kind from now on before every reliance movies release or any other production house movies release this may happen because reliance is just the first to do it the others will do it too .That means the sites will be blocked for a longer perod of time . once again fuck reliance pictures for starting the crap . So every file sharing site will be down so that one movie cannot be put on it . These fuckers have paid some serious money to whoever blocked this.

  • Aaarav Gupta

    I yet downloaded the movie and watched it

  • Sam

    This debate has been raging the world over and trying to curb torrent sites has been a futile battle. Apple changed the game for mp3 downloads by making individual mp3’s available at 99 cents via iTunes. When consumers have decent choice at affordable prices (99 cents is affordable for US not India), many consumers don’t see an incent in going for pirated wares.

    http://www.dealite.in – Your favorite brands at 5% of MRP

  • Again they seem to have blocked the site, blanket block!

  • Lets just not pay the bi!!