Many of the government's Section 69A orders—issued on grounds like public security and national security—have been consistently criticised for their lack of transparency.
In the ongoing challenge against government's fact check amendment, lawyers argued that it makes intermediaries judge content takedown, risking safe harbor loss.
“What we realised, after empirically counting the number of Section 66A cases instituted after Shreya Singhal, is that more of these cases were filed...
Section 66A of the IT Act—struck down by the SC—was reintroduced in India’s submissions for a global cybercrime treaty, and was removed again. What gives?
Interview with Pranesh Prakash on whether the micro-blogging site could have done more than simply contesting 39 Blocking Orders under India's IT Rules