News
In his dissent note, Patnaik explores how data regulators could be set up in line with India's principle of federalism.
Hi, what are you looking for?
Earnings Call: Vodafone Idea shares details of license fee expense, impact of Jio Bharat and more
Finance Ministry meets with banks, payments companies to discuss online fraud
Delhi High Court restricts DialMyTrip its name in trademark dispute with MakeMyTrip
NCLAT defers hearing of Google’s appeal against Play Store antitrust order
National Medical Commission pushes medical college patients to register via ABHA ID: Some questions and concerns
In his dissent note, Patnaik explores how data regulators could be set up in line with India's principle of federalism.
A breakdown of the committee member's dissent note reveals the rationale behind his proposed amendments.
In a dissent note, the two JPC members registered their frustrations on "excessive" powers to the government.
The Data Protection Bill, 2021 is one of the most important pieces of legislation in Indian tech policy.
Among other recommendations, the JPC has proposed the right to be forgotten with thoughts on how to enforce it.
The question of whether non-personal data should be legislated separately from personal data has surfaced repeatedly.
Data collection and processing limits proposed by the JPC in a report that also redefines social media platforms.
Authority over the bill's proposed data regulator is just one of the powers that the government will enjoy.
In light of major data breaches in India, a parliamentary committee recommends key powers for the proposed data regulator.
A parliamentary committee recommends who should be a data protection officer and what exactly they should do.
