News
The content that's been made inaccessible to Indian users was largely critical of India's ruling party.
Hi, what are you looking for?
Data Protection Bill: Financial data, non-personal data and algorithmic transparency should be regulated separately #NAMA
Data Protection Bill: Lower age of consent, limit data portability, strengthen data breach rules, and introduce more grounds for processing data #NAMA
With NPCI testing UPI Lite, Offline Digital Payments Might Soon Become Reality
Reliance Earnings: Jio completes 5G coverage planning for 1,000 cities, retail arm records all-time high revenue
Four arrested by Delhi and Mumbai Police for lewd comments in Clubhouse room
The content that's been made inaccessible to Indian users was largely critical of India's ruling party.
Key findings from a study reveal that defamation fueled most government requests for takedown.
The monthly report also showed that Instagram's proactive removal rate for hate speech fell by 7 percent.
User complaints were mostly focused on copyright infringement claims and Google complied with 98% of them.
Soon after the death of General Rawat in a chopper crash, several people faced police action for their social media posts.
The content in question was reportedly brought to the Ministry's attention by India's domestic intelligence agency.
Twitter had briefly blocked several handles in February on the government's orders, amid the 2020–21 farmer protests.
The social media platform's newly adopted policy is supposed to give users more control over how they appear online.
Disabling content within 36 hours is one of the requirements of the Rules which leave a lot open to interpretation.
The legal notice to Twitter asking it to fork over IP addresses and mobile numbers of users has raised eyebrows.
