wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

RBI asks banks to submit report on agreements entered with fintechs

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) appears to be checking adherence to the digital lending guidelines issued last September.

India’s central bank is asking banks to submit a report on the various agreements they have with fintech companies, The Hindu Businessline reported on March 14.

“The purpose of this report is to pinpoint certain critical aspects of the contracts, such as which entity has the ultimate ownership of the customer, whether the full responsibility of assessing the customer credit worthiness lies with the bank, fintech, or split between the two, and who is ultimately bearing the credit risk of the contract. In short, the objective is to ascertain whether the bank has full control of the underwriting process before onboarding the customer and would bear the credit risk in full, in case of defaults,” the report stated citing unnamed sources.

Why does this matter: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) appears to be checking adherence to the digital lending guidelines issued last September. These guidelines were issued to curb “unbridled engagement of third parties, mis-selling, breach of data privacy, unfair business conduct, charging of exorbitant interest rates, and unethical recovery practices,” RBI remarked back then.


STAY ON TOP OF TECH POLICY: Our daily newsletter with top stories from MediaNama and around the world, delivered to your inbox before 9 AM. Click here to sign up today! 


Why is RBI examining contracts: RBI could be looking at contracts between banks and fintechs to specifically check for compliance with the following three requirements of the digital lending guidelines:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  1. Lending can only be done by regulated entities: The digital lending guidelines state that regulated entities (banks, NBFCs) can engage with fintechs that act as lending service providers or digital lending apps, but the actual act of lending money and receiving repayments can only be carried out by the regulated entities and not any third-party fintech companies.
  2. Risk sharing arrangement between banks and fintechs: Fintechs and banks get into agreements to share the risk of lending. A popular risk-sharing method is the First Loss Default Guarantee (FLDG), whereby the fintech compensates lenders if the borrower defaults up to a certain amount. For fintechs, “offering FLDG acts as a demonstration of its under-writing skills whereas from the lender’s perspective, it ensures platform’s skin in the business,” an RBI working group report explained. Following this report, the RBI, in its digital lending guidelines, stated that regulated entities that engage in FLDG arrangements must adhere to the provisions of the Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Securitisation of Standard Assets) Directions, 2021. RBI could be checking for adherence to these directions.
  3. Banks are responsible for the conduct of fintechs: The digital lending guidelines also state that it is the responsibility of the regulated entities (banks, NBFCs) to ensure that the lending service providers and digital lending apps engaged by them comply with the guidelines.

This post is released under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Please feel free to republish on your site, with attribution and a link. Adaptation and rewriting, though allowed, should be true to the original.

Also Read

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.

Views

News

Amazon announced that it will integrate its logistics network and SmartCommerce services with the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC).

News

India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?

News

After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples

News

In the case of the ‘deemed consent' provision in the draft data protection law, brevity comes at the cost of clarity and user protection

News

The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.

You May Also Like

News

Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

Advert

135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...

News

By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

News

Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Name:*
Your email address:*
*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ