wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Five ways in which the Indian government has restricted digital media

The latest diktat for intermediaries to not host news termed “fake” by the PIB is among a slew of similar steps impacting digital media

Source: Freepik
African American woman shut with taped mouth, forced to be silent, closes eyes, afraids of speaking, sticks out head in paper wall, colored stickers for writing information, has no freedom of speech

The Indian government has dealt another blow to digital media intermediaries/ platforms after it added an amendment proposing that an intermediary may not carry content which is categorised as fake or false by the fact check unit (or any other government-authorised agency) at the Press Information Bureau (PIB) under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB).

Why it matters: The amendment is a telltale sign of dwindling freedoms enjoyed by online platforms under the Indian government. It leaves content uploaded on online platforms at the mercy of the state which is doubly concerning as the PIB’s fact-checking unit has been accused of bias in the past. Moreover, the amendment is in line with the government’s actions in the past few years which has tried to concentrate powers in its hands.

Documenting dwindling freedoms of digital media: It is not the first time that the government has made an effort to regulate content on digital media platforms as is evident from the time when the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, were released to the public. Here are five instances which document the trend—

FREE READ of the day by MediaNama: Click here to sign-up for our free-read of the day newsletter delivered daily before 9 AM in your inbox.

Curbing ‘fake news’: The latest directive instructs platforms to not host information fact-checked to be “fake” or “false” by the PIB, as per the proposal released by the IT Ministry.

  • The proposed amendment may allow for censorship of any information determined to be “fake” by a government agency. An analysis by Newslaundry found that PIB’s fact-checking unit has flagged articles critical of the Indian government.
  • It must also be remembered that there are no safeguards built into the amendment to prevent its misuse, promote transparency while “fact-checking”, or limit its scope.
  • The amendment may force platforms to monitor content proactively and take down “fake news” identified by the government and scramble to take it down on time.

Limits on FDI: The government mandated news aggregators in 2019 to make sure that their foreign direct investment (FDI) does not exceed 26 percent. The directive was issued by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade without clarifying the definition of digital media. It was considered to be a restrictive policy that inhibited Indian media from competing internationally. It applies to the following:

  • digital media entity streaming/uploading news and current affairs on websites, apps, or other platforms;
  • news agency which gathers, writes and distributes/transmits news, directly or indirectly, to digital media entities and/or news aggregators; and
  • news aggregator, being an entity which, using software or web application, aggregates news content from various sources, such as news websites, blogs, podcasts, video blogs, user submitted links, etc in one location.”

Overreach using Section 69A: The MIB has powers under the IT Rules, 2021, to block or modify online “news and current affairs” content on digital media firms and digital news platforms through an Inter-Departmental Committee and Oversight Mechanism.

  • The rules extended the government’s powers under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, to block internet content and reprimand publishers in the interests of “sovereignty, integrity, defence of India and security of the State or preventing a cognisable offence.”
  • The government has used these powers on numerous occasions in 2022 to block over 100 YouTube channels besides accounts on other social media platforms.

Grievance Redressal: The new rules put in place a three-tier grievance redressal system including a provision for a self-regulatory mechanism. The government will publish a charter for self-regulatory organisations. It shall create an inter-departmental committee to hear grievances that have not been resolved in Level I and II.

  • This committee can require content providers to reclassify their content’s age rating, edit the synopsis, or apologize.
    Complaints can also be referred to Level III for blocking or censoring under Section 69A of the IT Act.
  • The mechanism is applicable on digital news publishers and OTT (over-the-top) platforms. The latter also have to comply with Code of Ethics that have been laid down in the Rules.

Furnishing details: The rules also called for publishers of news and current affairs content to inform the MIB of its details “by furnishing information along with such documents as may be specified, for the purpose of enabling communication and coordination”.

  • Moreover, publishers have to issue monthly compliance reports mentioning details of the grievances received and the action taken. The ministry can ask publishers for additional information if necessary for the implementation of the rules.

Editorial take: Many feel that there’s a steady decline in freedoms of online (and offline) media in India, and constant attempts to whittle down its ability to express views or present information contrary to the government’s desires. “Misinformation” can prove to be an easy label to slap on anything that authorities find detrimental to their own interests. In a democracy, it should not be up to the government to decide what news is permissible since this reinforces the power imbalance between the State and citizens. Free speech should be as broad as possible, and the right to consume “misinformation” should be protected under this concept. Of course, things like official secrets or CSAM are outside its ambit. But ultimately, viewers/readers/users should be free to judge the quality of information source and its impact on themselves and others, without interference from the State  – Arjun, Sub-editor 

This post is released under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Please feel free to republish on your site, with attribution and a link. Adaptation and rewriting, though allowed, should be true to the original.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Also read:

Written By

I cover several beats such as Crypto, Telecom, and OTT at MediaNama. I can be found loitering at my local theatre when I am off work consuming movies by the dozen.

Free Reads

truecaller screen


TRAI first discussed the idea of implementing a CNAP service in a 2022 consultation paper, suggesting that it could be a solution to spam...


Instagram will also be testing a new machine-learning software that will recommend creators who cater to a brand’s needs.


Given the Review Committee’s orders will be published without details of the deliberations, it’s uncertain how meaningful the orders will be in terms of...

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Notably, Indus Appstore will allow app developers to use third-party billing systems for in-app billing without having to pay any commission to Indus, a...


The existing commission-based model, which companies like Uber and Ola have used for a long time and still stick to, has received criticism from...


Factors like Indus not charging developers any commission for in-app payments and antitrust orders issued by India's competition regulator against Google could contribute to...


Is open-sourcing of AI, and the use cases that come with it, a good starting point to discuss the responsibility and liability of AI?...


RBI Deputy Governor Rabi Shankar called for self-regulation in the fintech sector, but here's why we disagree with his stance.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ