wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Here’s How Indian Government Justifies Search and Seizures of Devices

Indian govt argues that individual rights claimed in the present case are to be necessarily balanced with the larger societal rights

The Centre doubled down on the position that the right to privacy is not absolute in last week's response to a Supreme Court petition critiquing the search and seizure of electronic devices. The petition filed by a group of academics at the Supreme Court critiqued the unchecked power with which investigative agencies search premises and seize electronic devices. The threat of academic work stored on these devices being damaged as a result of seizure is "considerable", added the petitioners. "Individual rights claimed in the present case is to be necessarily counter balanced with the larger societal rights as well," submitted the Centre in a counter affidavit viewed by MediaNama. "[With this interpretation] Article 21 rights [to privacy] are subject to 'procedure established by law'." Search and seizures of electronic documents falls under this exemption and are reasonable and duly proportionate, observed the Centre. The Indian government is well within the judicial limits established by Puttaswamy v Union of India (2017) as these practices further a legitimate state interest, it added. The Centre's response argued that substantial procedures were also in place to address the petitioners' concerns regarding search and seizures. Whether this procedure is always followed remains to be seen—recently, a Delhi court ruled that the accused in a Central Bureau of India (CBI) investigation cannot be compelled to share the passwords for their seized devices, as doing so would violate their right against self-incrimination. Why it matters: The reams of case law cited in the counter affidavit reinforce the government's argument…

Please subscribe/login to read the full story.
Written By

I'm interested in stories that explore how countries use the law to govern technology—and what this tells us about how they perceive tech and its impacts on society. To chat, for feedback, or to leave a tip: aarathi@medianama.com

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.

Views

News

India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?

News

After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples

News

In the case of the ‘deemed consent' provision in the draft data protection law, brevity comes at the cost of clarity and user protection

News

The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.

News

The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."

You May Also Like

News

Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

Advert

135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...

News

By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

News

Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Name:*
Your email address:*
*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ