Security concerns prevented Meta from including the findings of its India-specific investigation into hate speech in its first Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) released in July, as per audio recordings accessed by the Wall Street Journal. “This is not the report that the human-rights team at Meta wanted to publish, we wanted to be able to publish more,” reportedly said Meta's senior human-rights adviser Iain Levine during private briefings held with rights groups after the report’s release two months ago. Levine informed the group that 120 Meta employees had reviewed the final report—which was also approved by Meta’s Chief Legal Officer, Jennifer Newstead, and President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg. An Indian-Muslim researcher reportedly present at the meeting described the Big Tech giant’s decision as a “slap in my face and my people’s face who have endured so much hate speech on this platform”. They further requested the report’s full release. Meta also cited United Nations guidelines cautioning companies against releasing information that could ‘imperil stakeholders’ involved in an investigation. Why it matters: On September 15th, the Facebook Oversight Board (an independent body shaping Facebook and Instagram’s moderation policies) held discussions with South Asian stakeholders on whether its content moderation policies sufficiently protect users from harm. While dialogue may be a welcome step, Meta’s lack of transparency on the effects its platform has on human rights and minorities in India makes holding it accountable difficult. Instead, Indians are left dependent on the largesse of whistleblowers—such as Frances Haugen and Sophie…
- “Foreign state actor” may be responsible for the ransomware attack on AIIMS-Delhi: Report December 3, 2022
- Agenda: Reworking The Data Protection Bill, Delhi, 8th Dec #Ad December 3, 2022
- Why has the deadline to comply with UPI market share cap been extended by the NPCI? December 3, 2022
- India’s IT Minister on DPDP Bill: Law should be kept ‘simple’, subordinate rules won’t exceed Act December 3, 2022
- MIB approves ninth self regulatory body, PADMA, under the IT Rules, 2021 December 3, 2022
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
The Structure and Style of a Dogma Community: Conspiracy theories and organized Twitter engagement on Sushant Singh Rajput
Studying the 'community' supporting the late Sushant Singh Rajput (SSR) shows how Twitter was gamed through organized engagement
Do we have an enabling system for the National Data Governance Framework Policy (NDGFP) aiming to create a repository of non-personal data?
A viewpoint on why the regulation of cryptocurrencies and crypto exchnages under 2019's E-Commerce Rules puts it in a 'grey area'
India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...
Why ‘group privacy’ should be recognised, and how ‘non-personal’ data becomes a regulatory blindspot
There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...