wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Parliamentary panel suggests government should relook zero MDR policy for UPI

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce has asked the Indian government to rethink its zero MDR policy for UPI and RuPay.

“The Committee feels that a relook into the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) in UPI transactions and the structure of Payment Service Provider (PSP) fee is essential as financial transactions via UPI are expected to increase further in the future. The Committee, therefore, recommends the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) and Ministry of Finance to undertake comprehensive stakeholders’ consultation in this regard,” the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce said in its report on Promotion and Regulation of E-Commerce in India presented to the Rajya Sabha on June 16.

What is MDR? For each transaction involving credit cards, debit cards, net banking, and digital wallets, the merchant usually pays a certain percentage of the transaction amount, known as Merchant Discount Rate (MDR), which is divided among the banks and payment service providers for their services. Credit cards, for example, attract around 2 percent MDR, meaning for every Rs. 1,000 that a merchant gets paid, Rs. 20 will go as fees. But UPI and RuPay debit cards attract zero percent MDR charges due to government regulations, which is what makes them popular among merchants.

Why are banks not happy with zero-MDR? While MDR has been waived for merchants, “banks still have to pay PSP (Payment Service Provider) fee to service providers like GooglePay, Paytm, PhonePe, etc,” the Committee noted. “Banks made a submission to the Committee that the MDR on UPI transactions may be reintroduced and the PSP fee, switching fee and interchange fee are restructured so that all participant banks/PSPs in the UPI ecosystem share the payable fee proportionately,” the Committee said.

Why did government waive MDR for UPI? The proposal for withdrawing the merchant discount rate was first announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman during the Budget 2019. She said that the RBI and banks should bear this cost “from the savings that will accrue to them on account of handling less cash.” The primary goal of the government was/is to increase the acceptance of digital payments.

Payments industry’s views: Ever since it was first proposed, the payments industry has, expectedly, objected to zero MDR. Back then, the Payments Council of India (PCI) had said that the move will eventually lead to the collapse of the payments acquiring industry because, without any income from digital transactions for banks, incentives for banks to roll out digital payments infrastructure are reduced.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Parliamentary Committee also suggests UPI players be held to the same security standards as banks:  “Ensuring the security of financial transactions through UPI is vital given the fact that majority of e-commerce payment is undertaken through this platform. The Committee, therefore, recommends that security measures/Standard Operating Procedures that are applicable to banks should be made mandatory for UPI-based Payment Service Providers (PSPs) to avoid financial fraud on their payment platforms. The Committee further recommends the payment platforms should be held accountable for financial frauds perpetuated on their platforms in case of non-compliance to mandatory security measures,” the Committee noted.

Also Read

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ