wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

India’s crypto industry to approach Supreme Court seeking relief from tax regime: Report

To add insult to injury, the government recently clarified that loss on crypto assets cannot be offset against gains.

The Indian cryptocurrency industry is not happy with the prohibitive nature of the country’s taxation structure, according to a CoinDesk report. The industry stakeholders may approach the Supreme Court in order to seek relaxation from the structure, the report added. A decision has not been taken yet.

The legal challenge will be in the form of a public interest litigation (PIL), the news website revealed. Several representatives from the industry have been lobbying for tax breaks in their discussions with the government since the crypto tax was announced in the Budget for 2022-23 last month.

“It would have to be a collaborative effort, including crypto exchanges, (non-fungible token) platforms and blockchain companies since everyone will be affected,” an unnamed executive from a crypto exchange was quoted as saying.

The collaborative effort may see participation from a few entities as they choose to sit out the legal challenge because of their “symbiotic approach” to regulation as opposed to an “adversarial approach”, CoinDesk reported, adding that some exchanges will try to seek favourable terms through discussion.

The move to knock on the doors of the Supreme Court indicates that the industry is not satisfied with the government proposal. As the date of the implementation comes closer, the industry would want to take action swiftly given the wide-ranging implications and complications arising out of the proposed tax.

What is the crypto industry lobbying against?

The industry seems keen on getting the Union government to do away or reduce the one percent Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). Members from the crypto industry reached out to the finance ministry last week urging it to consider their proposal. The members made their representation through the Blockchain and Crypto Assets Council (BACC) which met with the ministry officials, Economic Times reported last week.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The industry suggested that the proposed TDS be reduced to about 0.01 percent.

“The 1 per cent tax at source makes it unviable and if track and trace was the intent, a 0.01 per cent can serve that intent,” IndiaTech CEO Rameesh Kailasam was quoted as saying.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced that the government will be charging a 30 percent tax on all crypto transactions in her Budget speech for 2022-23 in February. She also clarified then that taxation does not lend legitimacy to the unregulated crypto sector and that the government will come out with a bill after the conclusion of stakeholder consultations.

The 30 percent tax rate, which is usually reserved for horse racing and gambling, has not gone down well with the members of the industry. But many believe that the government is unlikely to budge on it, as per CoinDesk.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Loss on crypto-assets cannot be offset against gains

To add insult to injury, the Union government recently clarified in Lok Sabha that losses incurred from one kind of virtual digital assets (VDAs) cannot be offset against the gains from any transaction involving another VDA while computing tax. The answer came in response to queries by Lok Sabha MP Karti P Chidamabaram.

It may end up dissuading traders and investors as the burden of losses will have to be managed by the investors themselves. Ashish Singhal, Co-founder and CEO of CoinSwitch said: “This is detrimental for India’s crypto industry and the millions who have invested in this emerging asset class. We fear the lack of provision to offset losses will drive away users from KYC-compliant exchanges and platforms to the underground peer-to-peer grey market, which would defeat the purpose of the tax.”

Singhal added that the move is also regressive and not in line with the government’s recognition of VDAs as an emerging asset class.

The government also clarified that expenditure on mining infrastructure will not be considered as the cost of acquisition. The cost can then be treated as a deductible from overall gains.

“Infrastructure costs incurred in mining of VDA (eg. crypto assets) will not be treated as cost of acquisition as the same will be in the nature of capital expenditure which is not allowable as deduction,” the minister answered.

Is the Union government planning to bring crypto under GST?

The crypto industry was cautioned by government officials that they should be focused on GST instead of TDS. The officials were referring to a plan in which the government is looking to bring cryptocurrencies under the ambit of GST, according to a Press Trust Of India report.

India levies an 18 percent tax on the services provided by crypto exchanges, which could be increased to 28 percent, PTI wrote in its report. GST officers were of the view that cryptocurrencies, by nature, are similar to lottery, casinos, betting, gambling, horse racing, the report added.

If GST is levied on the entire value of cryptocurrency transactions, the rate may be in the ballpark of 0.1 to 1 per cent, another official said. “The percentage of tax, whether it would be 0.1 per cent or one percent, is still being debated. First, a decision on the classification of the asset has be made, and then the tariff would be discussed,” an unnamed official told PTI.

Also Read:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Have something to add? Post your comment and gift someone a MediaNama subscription.

Written By

I cover several beats such as Crypto, Telecom, and OTT at MediaNama. I can be found loitering at my local theatre when I am off work consuming movies by the dozen.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...


There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data


Existing consumer protection regulations are not sufficient to cover the extent of protection that a crypto-investor would require.


The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ