wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Concerned about well-being, Delhi Court grants bail to alleged creators of Bulli Bai and Sulli Deals

The apps had led to widespread outrage for auctioning off several Muslim women online.

Court Judiciary

“Prolonged incarceration would be detrimental to his overall well being,” Delhi’s Patiala House Court observed while granting bail to the main accused in the Bulli Bai case (Neeraj Bishnoi) and Sulli Deals case (Aumkareshwar Thakur) on March 29, according to a LiveLaw report. The apps had led to an uproar for putting several Muslim women up for a fake online auction and thus, subjecting them to harassment and distress.

In the Bulli Bai case, the court reportedly said:

“Merely because replies from different intermediaries and FSL is awaited, same is not sufficient reason to deny bail to the accused as accused is not position to influence FSL result or replies… Accused has roots in the society community and he is not a flight risk. The trial would take considerable time to save as such no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him detained any further.”

Meanwhile, in the Sulli Deals case, the court noted that since the accused was already suspended from his college, any longer imprisonment would be detrimental to his career and well-being.

According to LiveLaw, the court also observed:

“As per the facts, the forensic examination of laptop and mobilephone of the accused has been completed and evidence has been collected by the Investigating Officer. The ground for opposing the bail application taken by the prosecution is that investigation is on going, the said plea is vague and not sufficient to deny bail in the absence of cogent ground.”

In August 2021, hundreds of Muslim women found themselves being put up for auction on an app called Sulli Deals. While there was widespread outrage, police action only came after January 2022 after another app called Bulli Bai emerged with similar intent.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Cases filed against those involved in the two apps

While in the Bulli Bai case, the main accused was arrested on January 9, the Sulli Deals main accused was arrested on January 6.

The FIR against the alleged creator of the Sulli Deals app was filed under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, which pertains to assault or criminal force on a woman with intent to outrage her modesty.

Meanwhile, an FIR against the alleged creators of the Bulli Bai app was filed with the Delhi police under IPC:

  • Section 153 A – Promoting enmity between different religious groups
  • Section 153 B – Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national-integration
  • Section 354 (A) – Assault of criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty.
  • Section 509 – Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman

Several FIRs were also filed with the Uttar Pradesh Police, Mumbai Police, Cyberabad Police, and Hyderabad Police. The Delhi and Mumbai Police filed chargesheets based on their investigations, earlier this month.

“I have not heard back on anything from the police and secondly, it is the UP Police so I have no hope. I have no expectations other than for them to be arrested,” one of the victims who had filed an FIR with the UP Police told MediaNama last month.

Also Read:

Have something to add? Post your comment and gift someone a MediaNama subscription

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I cover health technology for MediaNama but, really, love all things tech policy. Always willing to chat with a reader! Reach me at anushka@medianama.com

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Do we have an enabling system for the National Data Governance Framework Policy (NDGFP) aiming to create an repository of non-personal data?


A viewpoint on why the regulation of cryptocurrencies and crypto exchnages under 2019's E-Commerce Rules puts it in a 'grey area'


India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...


There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data


Existing consumer protection regulations are not sufficient to cover the extent of protection that a crypto-investor would require.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ