Rajya Sabha MP Vivek Tankha dissented clauses 12 and 35 of the Data Protection Bill, 2021, which allow for the government to process personal data without consent from users in certain cases and give the government the power to exempt any of its agencies from any or all provisions of the Bill. "Though I am in broad agreement with the recommendations of the JPC [joint parliamentary committee], deeper contemplation puts me in doubt in respect of [these] two recommendations," Tankha wrote in his dissent note. Amendments to these provisions "are necessary to prevent abuse of the power of exception so liberally granted to the state," Tankha added. The landmark JPC report along with Data Protection Bill 2021 was tabled in both houses of the Parliament on December 16 after two years of deliberations, bringing us one step closer to India’s first data protection law. Here’s our complete guide to the Data Protection Bill, 2021 Inconsistent with Puttaswamy judgement MP Vivek Tankha noted that the Bill "finds itself based on an incorrect architecture/assumption that the right to privacy arise only for protection against breach of private and the state is virtually exempted from these constitutional responsibilities." Referring to the landmark Puttaswamy judgement from 2017, which was the impetus for the Data Protection Bill, Tankha noted that giving the government special status is inconsistent with the spirit of this judgement as the Supreme Court made the following observation: “Privacy is a concomitant of the right of the individual to exercise control over his or her personality. It…
- Supreme Court Dismisses Plea by Foundation for Media Professionals on Internet Shutdowns December 8, 2023
- Public Spaces and Private Rights: The ‘Humanity’ Mural Copyright Controversy December 8, 2023
- Event Postponement: Deep Fakes and Democracy Virtual Event #Ad December 8, 2023
- BharatNet needs to be probed by a Joint Parliamentary Committee: MP Karti Chidambaram December 8, 2023
- Indian Government Extends Consultation Deadline for Draft Broadcasting Bill to January 15th, 2024 December 8, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
Factors like Indus not charging developers any commission for in-app payments and antitrust orders issued by India's competition regulator against Google could contribute to...
Is open-sourcing of AI, and the use cases that come with it, a good starting point to discuss the responsibility and liability of AI?...
RBI Deputy Governor Rabi Shankar called for self-regulation in the fintech sector, but here's why we disagree with his stance.
Straw man fallacy: IT Ministers’ defence of government exemptions in data protection law misses the point
Both the IT Minister and the IT Minister of State have chosen to avoid the actual concerns raised, and have instead defended against lesser...
The Central Board of Film Certification found power outside the Cinematograph Act and came to be known as the Censor Board. Are OTT self-regulating...
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...