wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Microsoft, Google throw weight behind Facebook in legal fight against NSO Group

NSO Group Pegasus
NSO Group Pegasus

Microsoft, Google, and a host of other companies and organisations have come out in support of  Facebook’s legal case against Israeli firm NSO Group. The two companies, along with Cisco, LinkedIn, VMWare and the Internet Association, filed an amicus brief in Facebook’s support, calling NSO Group’s business model “dangerous”.

NSO Group sells the controversial “Pegasus” software, which could be used to exploit a since-then fixed vulnerability in WhatsApp to plant it on a target’s device. WhatsApp had informed 1,400 of its users, including 121 Indians, that were affected by this attack. NSO Group, for its part, has always maintained, including in responses to MediaNama, that it sells its products only to governments and authorised intelligence agencies.

Announcing the filing of the amicus brief in a blog post, Microsoft took objection to the “legal immunity” argument of NSO Group. It said the company is “attempting to cloak itself in the legal immunity afforded to its government customers, which would shield it from accountability when its weapons inflict harm on innocent people and businesses”. It said that the legal immunity would enable NSO Group and other “private-sector offensive actors (PSOA)” to continue their “dangerous business” without legal rules, responsibilities or repercussions. Private companies should remain subject to liability when they use their cyber-surveillance tools to break the law, said Microsoft.

  • ‘Such tools will fall into wrong hands’: The companies argued that the presence of tools such as Pegasus increases the risk of their falling into wrong hands. Previously, it said, such tools only existed with counties with well-funded agencies. Even then, these tools got into the hands of “other government” who used them in attacks like WannaCry and NotPetya. “Lowering the barrier for access to these weapons would guarantee such catastrophes would be repeated.”
  • ‘Private sector doesn’t follow same rules as government’: Governments with offensive cyber capabilities still have the need to protect their citizens. Hence, when a vulnerability is discovered, they may share it with the provider to patch it up. However, private companies like NSO Group, the companies said, are only interested in keeping these vulnerabilities to themselves to profit by exploiting them.
  • ‘Companies like NSO Group threaten human rights’: The companies said that tools sold by PSOAs like NSO Group are being used to spy on human rights defenders, journalists and others. “Privacy is fundamental to the ability of journalists to report, of dissidents to speak their voices and of democracy to flourish and these tools threaten their rights and their lives,” they said.
    • Of the 121 Indians targeted using Pegasus, at least 22 were activists, lawyers and scholars, most of them involved in the Bhima Koregaon case. NSO Group’s software has, per a Citizen Lab report, been used to target civil society in Morocco, Mexico and several other countries.

Earlier last month, NSO Group made a fresh bid to get Facebook’s lawsuit against it dismissed, banking on the “foreign sovereign immunity” arguments. The company told an American appeals court that NSO’s foreign-state customers decide how to use Pegasus, and hence Facebook was trying to “meddle in the sovereign affairs” of other nations.

Also read:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



While the market reality of popular crypto-assets like Bitcoin may undergo little change, the same can't be said for stablecoins.


Bringing transactions related to crypto-assets within the tax net could make matters less fuzzy.


Loopholes in FEMA and the decentralised nature of crypto-assets point to a need for effective regulations.


The need of the hour is for lawmakers to understand the systems that are amplifying harmful content.


For drone delivery to become a reality, a permissive regulatory regime is a prerequisite.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ