wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

DoT refuses to provide comments it received on China’s New IP proposal


The Department of Telecommunications has refused to disclose inputs it received on Huawei and China’s New Internet Protocol (New IP) proposal. The DoT had started the consultation — that MediaNama first reported on — in an effort to formulate India’s response to China’s proposal to create a new internet protocol that will replace existing technology. In response to an RTI query filed by MediaNama, the DoT told us that of all the government and non-government stakeholders it reached out to for comment, only ten had responded as of October 15 (the consultation’s deadline was set as September 14 when it was issued).

The department refused to provide a copy of those ten submissions, as “the information can not be provided as the same is third party information and not permitted under section 8(1)(d) of RTI act [sic] 2005”. Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act exempts “information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party”.

This is an odd exemption to use, as the consultation is generic in nature and responses are mostly from industry associations, who aren’t likely to offer “commercially sensitive” material in response, or trade secrets for that matter. Indeed, the filing of the Broadband India Forum, which responds fairly comprehensively to the DoT consultation, does not contain any material that appears to fall under the categories exempted by the section of the RTI Act the DoT cited.

MediaNama intends to appeal this decision, as the inputs that lead to the government forming its position on New IP, which if approved could fundamentally change the architecture of the internet as we know it, is essential for the public to have access to.

Meanwhile, the DoT said that the following stakeholders provided inputs on its white paper on New IP:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  1. ITU-APT Foundation of India
  2. ITI Council
  3. Airtel
  4. GSMA
  5. CCAOI
  6. Broadband India Forum
  7. CMAI
  8. ACTO
  9. IAMAI
  10. ICANN

If you can provide a copy of one of the responses listed above, please send them at aroon@medianama.com. 

Also read

Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ