The legal immunity enjoyed by internet companies such as Facebook and Twitter is under challenge in the US. Ajit Pai, chair of the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced that the regulatory body will start exploring the legal interpretation of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1986, which guarantees safe harbour protections to companies operating on the internet. Pai's announcement came just a day after Twitter and Facebook, in a controversial more, decided to block and impede the distribution of news articles by the New York Post with supposedly unverified information about Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his family, inviting widespread criticism from Republican leaders, including US President Donald Trump. It also follows repeated attempts by the country's executive and legislative branches of government to dilute Section 230 protections to bring social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to heel. From the country's judiciary, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recently said the legal immunity under Section 230 was being interpreted too broadly, and that the court needs to examine it in the future. In a statement, Pai said that the US Department of Commerce had petitioned FCC to "clarify the ambiguities in section 230". He said that all branches of the US government had expressed "serious concerns" about Section 230. He added that there is bipartisan support in the Congress to reform the law. "As elected officials consider whether to change the law, the question remains: What does Section 230 currently mean? Many advance an overly broad interpretation that…
- Quick Take: ChatGPT has revived the debate about AI taking away jobs January 31, 2023
- MediaNama Daily: Will this truth last forever? January 31, 2023
- India’s Health Stack: Plans for “Single Source Of Truth” January 30, 2023
- Twitter plans to limit permanent account suspensions on its platform January 30, 2023
- What’s the deal with Andhra Pradesh’s new family doctor system? January 30, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?
After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples
The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.
The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...