wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

TikTok US employee asks court to block Trump’s ban

Screenshots from TikTok App

A TikTok US employee last week filed an injunction motion to stop the Department of Commerce from implementing President Donald Trump’s August 6 executive order that bans American companies from transacting with Bytedance.

The case was filed at the Northern District of California’s district court by Patrick Ryan, a technical program manager at TikTok US. Stating that the “TikTok is neither owned, operated, nor controlled by China or the Chinese government” and “does not even operate in China”, Ryan argued that the order’s language may prevent Bytedance from paying wages or salaries to its American employees.

The motion points out that Trump’s executive order directs the Department of Commerce to “identify transactions” that are to be prohibited, without delineating their contours. It further allows the government to keep everyone in the dark about what specific transactions will be banned until the order comes into effect on September 21. The order’s broad language “will create a chilling effect” on anybody who has done business with TikTok. Ryan declared that the order is “unlawful and unconstitutional”.

TikTok’s 1,500 American employees need to know whether they will be paid next month, Ryan argued, especially given that many of them are on visas that are sponsored by their employers. “The U.S. employees of TikTok are pawns in a political spitting match between China and President Trump, who has decided to make “Tough on China”a central theme of his embattled re-election campaign,” the motion says.

Late last month, TikTok sued the Trump administration, stating its August 6 order unconstitutional, and that it was issue for political reasons and does not follow due legal process. Multiple American companies are racing to buy TikTok followers, with Oracle fighting a joint bid by Microsoft and Walmart. Meanwhile, the Chinese government has inserted itself into the decision, by requiring any export of artificial intelligence to first get its approval.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Written By

I cover health, policy issues such as intermediary liability, data governance, internet shutdowns, and more. Hit me up for tips.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ