The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday passed an interim order staying the state government's orders which placed restrictions on online classes, reported LiveLaw. At the same time, the court clarified that school authorities do not have a right to make online classes compulsory, and children who do not opt for it should not be deprived of normal education, as and when schools are able to resume education. Additionally, the order reportedly clarified that schools cannot charge extra fees for conducting online classes either. It was passed by a division bench of Chief Justice A.S. Oka and Justice Nataraj Rangaswamy. "Prima facie we are of the view that both orders of June 15 and June 27, encroached upon the Fundamental Right conferred by Article 21 and 21A of the Constitution," the order said, per LiveLaw. The state government's June 15 order said that schools should not impart online education until the expert committee constituted by the government submitted its report on the viability of online classes. Later, the government amended its order allowing online classes for children in Lower KG to Class X for limited hours. Stating that the state had no "rational basis" to place restrictions, the court said that just because the state cannot extend online education to certain category of schools, it is not a ground to prevent 'elite' schools from carrying out online classes. The state government's rationale was that if certain students take classes, the others will be left out.
- The Fine Line: Regulating Real Money Gaming in India #QuickTake February 4, 2023
- Join the Club: Along with Telegram, WhatsApp Also Faces Copyright Infringement Cases at Delhi HC February 4, 2023
- Microsoft Teams Premium to incorporate ChatGPT: 4 key take aways February 3, 2023
- Update: Supreme Court Asks Indian Govt to Produce Records Issued To ‘Block’ BBC Documentary February 3, 2023
- RTI: Nearly 5,000 URLs blocked under Section 69A in the first 10 months of 2022 February 3, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?
After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples
The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.
The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...