wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Zuckerberg cites a post from India as a clear-cut example of ‘incitement to violence’

Kapil mishra, hate speech, tweet

For Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, while posts from US President Donald Trump may not pose a “100 per cent clear-cut of a decision”, posts from India where “someone” said “‘Hey, if the police don’t take care of this, our supporters will get in there and clear the streets’” are a clear cut case of incitement of violence and have been taken down. This was revealed in a transcript of a meeting that Zuckerberg held with 25,000 employees on June 2. Recode published the transcript of the meeting.

Zuckerberg was referring to BJP leader Kapil Mishra’s comments during the Delhi riots, though he didn’t mention him by name. Mishra had tweeted on February 23, “I give Delhi Police a three-day ultimatum to clear the streets of Jaffrabad and Chand Bagh. After that, don’t explain anything to us, we will not listen. Only three days” and tagged Delhi Police in the tweet. Although the original tweet has been taken down (it’s unclear whether by the government, as Twitter hasn’t disclosed any request for that particular tweet), an archived copy is available here. We couldn’t find the concurrent Facebook posts.

The furore against Zuckerberg and Facebook erupted when Zuckerberg refused to take down or add an addendum to Trump’s posts that said, “When the looting starts, the shooting starts”, that sought to threaten people protesting against racism after the Minneapolis police murdered George Floyd, an African American man, as they arrested him. Twitter had placed a public interest notice on the same tweet by Trump and limited its spread by disabling “Like” and “Retweet” (without comment) on the tweet, and fact checked Trump on his tweet about mail-in ballots in California. But Zuckerberg stood his ground, even as multiple Facebook employees resigned in protest and staged the company’s first walkout, albeit a virtual one, to make their voices heard.

But in the June 2 meeting, Zuckerberg maintained that Trump’s posts eventually did not violate Facebook’s content policies. He said that Trump’s posts could be read in three ways — “discussion of state use of force” which Facebook allows as “states are legally allowed to use force”, “a prediction of violence in the future” which is also allowed on Facebook, and third, “incitement to violence” which a direct call for violence and warrants a takedown. As per Facebook’s analysis, Trump’s post fell in the first reading, while Mishra’s in the third.

Apart from the example for India, Zuckerberg cited the case of a legislator from Hong Kong “who called for the police to come in and clear out and kill the protesters to restore order in society”. This post was taken down. It is not clear how Trump’s post is different.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Zuckerberg further said that the comment “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” “has no history of being read as a dog whistle for vigilante supports to take justice into their own hands”. Instead of talking to “all the different folks” that he talked to, he could just read one article about the racist history of the phrase and its use by segregationists by NPR, or by Washington Post, or Vox.

We have reached out to Facebook for more information about the post Zuckerberg was referring to, and to Twitter for information about Mishra’s tweet.

Written By

Send me tips at aditi@medianama.com. Email for Signal/WhatsApp.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The US and other countries' retreat from a laissez-faire approach to regulating markets presents India with a rare opportunity.


When news that Walmart would soon accept cryptocurrency turned out to be fake, it also became a teachable moment.


The DSCI's guidelines are patient-centric and act as a data privacy roadmap for healthcare service providers.


In this excerpt from the book, the authors focus on personal data and autocracies. One in particular – Russia.  Autocracies always prioritize information control...


By Jai Vipra, Senior Resident Fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy The use of new technology, including facial recognition technology (FRT) by police...

You May Also Like


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ