wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SC refuses to restore 4G in J&K, asks centre-led ‘special committee’ to examine issues

The Supreme Court today directed the Central government to constitute a “special committee” headed by the Union Home Secretary to ascertain whether it’s necessary to continue restrictions on the internet in Jammu & Kashmir. The committee will be headed by the Union Home Secretary, and also consists of Union Communications Secretary, and chief secretary of Jammu & Kashmir. The court directed the committee to examine the issues raised by the petitioners, as well as the government’s responses.

It will examine how appropriate the alternatives suggested by the petitioners are, such as limiting restrictions only to areas where it is necessary, and allowing 3G or 4G speeds on a trial basis in certain geographical areas, the court said. The committee will then advise the Union government. The ‘special committee’ is effectively a replacement of the Review Committee under the Telecom Suspension (or Internet Shutdowns) Rules under the Telegraph Act. The review committee consists of state level officials to review internet shutdown orders passed by a state. For orders passed by the Central government, central level officials, including the Union Home Secretary, are part of the committee.

The court observed that since the issues affect the state and country, the Review Committee, “which consists of only State level officers, may not be in a position to satisfactorily address all the issues raised”. However, Jammu & Kashmir was culled out into a union territory by the Centre after the abrogation of its special status in August 2019. Union territories are administered directly by the Centre.

“In Anuradha Bhasin case, we said that there should be adequate procedural safeguards. On the same note, we directed to constitute a committee of secretaries comprising of Centre and States, Secy of MHA, Ministry of Communication, and CS of J&K,” the bench said.

Since the court refrained from passing any order on restoration of 4G services — the status quo will prevail in the union territory, which was first plunged into a seven-month communications blackout amid a political crisis following the abrogation of Article 370. After the Supreme Court intervened in response to a petition filed by Kashmir Times editor Anuradha Bhasin, the administration finally restored access to a limited number of whitelisted websites. Internet services — limited to 2G speeds, with increased scrutiny of prepaid SIM cards — were restored only on March 4, just weeks before the coronavirus pandemic and lockdown hit the country.

The petitioners had asked for restoration of 4G internet, given the fallouts of the COVID-19 crisis and the subsequent nationwide lockdown. The 3-judge bench comprised of Justices N.V. Ramana, R. Subhash Reddy, and B.R. Gavai has reserved order on the case on May 4 on petitions filed by Foundation for Media Professionals, Private Schools Association of J&K, and Soayib Qureshi.

Foundation for Media Professionals sought restoration of 4G speeds, citing difficulties in access to online classes and accurate information, in delivery of healthcare in the territory, and the inability to “work from home” due to slow internet speeds, amidst the ongoing COVID-19 crisis and lockdown. Doctors are struggling to download latest studies, protocols, manuals and advisories on treatment and management of COVID-19, the foundation said. Telemedicine and online education are impossible to carry out on 2G speeds, and the public’s access to information is impeded, they added.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I cover health, policy issues such as intermediary liability, data governance, internet shutdowns, and more. Hit me up for tips.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ