wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

, ,

Several police complaints and FIRs against Arnab Goswami invoke defunct Section 66A of IT Act

At least five of the several police complaints and FIRs against Republic TV anchor Arnab Goswami demanded action against him under Section 66A of the  Information Technology Act, which was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in five years ago. The cases were triggered by Goswami’s studio-debate on the Palghar lynching incident, in which he questioned why Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi was not raising her voice against the lynching of the two sadhus. Several FIRs, at least 16 per Bar & Bench, were filed for the show being defamatory to Sonia Gandhi.

In Himachal Pradesh, Leader of Opposition Mukesh Agnihotri and Himachal Pradesh Congress president Kuldeep Singh Rathore filed an FIR on April 23 against Arnab Goswami at Shimla Sadar Police Station, demanding action under Section 66A of the IT Act, among other IPC sections.

Odisha MP Saptagiri Ulaka’s police complaint in Delhi included Section 66A, so did a request for an FIR in Maharashtra, and two police complaints in Jharkhand. Another police complaint filed by the Tamil Nadu Youth Congress in Chennai also invoked Section 66A of the IT Act.

Section 66A of the IT Act was a vaguely worded provision which allowed the imprisonment of anybody for posting offensive comments online. The section was often arbitrarily interpreted, and eventually struck down by the Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal. Last year, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), one of the original petitioners in the Shreya Singhal case asked the Supreme Court for direction that further cases under Section 66A not be permitted.

The Supreme Court had then threatened to jail any official responsible for the continued prosecution and harassment of people under Section 66A. PUCL had said that 22 fresh cases were registered under the section in various states and that older cases had not been scrapped.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Written By

I cover health, policy issues such as intermediary liability, data governance, internet shutdowns, and more. Hit me up for tips.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The US and other countries' retreat from a laissez-faire approach to regulating markets presents India with a rare opportunity.


When news that Walmart would soon accept cryptocurrency turned out to be fake, it also became a teachable moment.


The DSCI's guidelines are patient-centric and act as a data privacy roadmap for healthcare service providers.


In this excerpt from the book, the authors focus on personal data and autocracies. One in particular – Russia.  Autocracies always prioritize information control...


By Jai Vipra, Senior Resident Fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy The use of new technology, including facial recognition technology (FRT) by police...

You May Also Like


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ