wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

YouTube will remove election-related manipulated videos ahead of US elections

YouTube app on a mobile phone

As the United States of America prepares for the 2020 Presidential elections, YouTube reiterated that it would remove “technically manipulated or doctored” videos, as well as content that tries to mislead people about voting and census issues, like when and where to vote. Channels that attempt to impersonate another person or channel, misrepresent their country of origin, or conceal their association with a government actor, would be terminated, the platform said. Also, channels that “artificially increase” engagement on their content would also be terminated. While none of these measures are new, it lays out an overview of how the platform would deal with misleading election-related videos on its platform. We’ve reached out to YouTube for further clarification on the questions listed below.

Videos that have incorrect information about voting, including trying to mislead people by using an incorrect voting date, would not be allowed. It said it would also remove videos that spread lies about a political candidate’s citizenship status or eligibility for public office. One example of a serious risk could be a video that was technically manipulated to make it appear that a government official was dead, YouTube said.

YouTube’s overview is in line with moves being made by big tech firms ahead of US’ 2020 elections, to grapple with the issue of online disinformation. Earlier this year, Facebook said that it would take down videos that have been edited beyond adjustments for clarity or quality using artificial intelligence/machine learning. In October 2019, Twitter announced that it would not allow political and issue ads on the platform.

A few questions:

  • What are ‘technically manipulated’ videos? It isn’t clear if a viral video of Presidential candidate Joseph Biden, which was merely cut in a way to make it appear as if he were making racist remarks, would be allowed on YouTube. Similarly, what would happen to another viral video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, which was slowed down to suggest that she was in an inebriated state?
  • What about deepfakes? There isn’t enough clarity if deepfakes — highly convincing videos doctored using AI/ML — would also be taken down.
  • What happens to parody/satire channels? A number of creators on YouTube run parody/satirical channels, where most of their content revolves around impersonating people. YouTube’s policy suggests that such content would also be taken down, and channels posting such content would be terminated.
    • Facebook’s policy on dealing with doctored videos, for instance, had said that content that is satirical in nature would not be taken down.

Big tech attempts to battle deepfake videos

  • In October 2019, Twitter had said that it was working on a new policy to “address synthetic and manipulated media” on the platform and had sought comments on the same. Twitter is yet to come out with the policy.
  • In September 2019, Facebook and Microsoft announced the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) to produce technology that can be used to detect a deepfake videos.
    • In October 2019, Amazon Web Services said that it would work with Facebook and Microsoft on the challenge and contribute up to $1 million in AWS credits to researchers and academics over the next two years.
  • In September 2019, Google released a large dataset of visual deepfakes in order to aid researchers to directly support deepfake detection efforts.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Do we have an enabling system for the National Data Governance Framework Policy (NDGFP) aiming to create a repository of non-personal data?


A viewpoint on why the regulation of cryptocurrencies and crypto exchnages under 2019's E-Commerce Rules puts it in a 'grey area'


India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...


There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data


Existing consumer protection regulations are not sufficient to cover the extent of protection that a crypto-investor would require.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ