"Traceability is just about establishing who is availing using the service," said Sameer Nigam, CEO of PhonePe at our discussion on Intermediary Liability in Bangalore on November 22, 2019. "Demanding traceability is not a way for the government to get a back door, companies have to be held accountable, the government has to have a reason [for demanding traceability]. It’s not a way for tech companies to have a back door to your private conversations," he said. Nigam said that it made sense for platforms to enforce traceability, since being able to trace a user — if law enforcement asks for it — is a reasonable demand, and platforms should comply with the law of the land. Instead of trying to split the role of the intermediaries, Nigam argued, we can consider the liabilties that platforms can be held responsible for: Whether traceability is the responsibility of a service provider of knowing who their users are, which is a fair demand of countries and/or law enforcement. Whether a service provider is liable for determining if some content is right or wrong, hateful or not, vicious or not. But no two countries will agree on the standards, so this isn't a matter for courts or police to decide, but it's a matter to be considered at the governance level of the individual companies. There's a difference between a country's prevailing law declaring something illegal, and a platform saying that something is hateful, unacceptable, or threatening. If the court of the land says that…
- Practo Partners With Government To Help Develop India’s Health Stack January 31, 2023
- Attend Our Briefing: Impact of Google’s changes to Android and Play Store January 31, 2023
- Why is Andhra government pushing facial recognition attendance on all its workers? January 31, 2023
- Karthik Rai On Developing an Interoperability Framework for India | Meta India Tech Scholars 2021-22 January 31, 2023
- Indian Telecom Watchdog issues consultation paper on regulating converged digital technologies and services January 31, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?
After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples
The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.
The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...