A Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, dismissed former RSS ideologue K.N. Govindacharya’s petition (W.P. (Crl) 324/2019) accusing WhatsApp of perjury for misleading the Supreme Court during the Facebook transfer petition “by claiming that users[‘] data is fully encrypted and no one including WhatsApp has the key”. However, Govindacharya has been given the liberty to refile. He had filed the petition against Facebook, WhatsApp, MeitY and Union of India in the Pegasus-NSO Group snooping row. Govindacharya had filed a criminal writ petition asking the apex court to commence perjury proceedings against WhatsApp, and for a National Investigation Agency investigation and FIR against Facebook, WhatsApp and NSO Group under the Information technology Act, 2000, and Indian Penal Code, 1860. ‘Where is the proof of perjury?’ asks Court The bench told the petitioner’s lawyers that for charges of perjury, they had not quoted from the submissions made in court. To that, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, on behalf of Govindacharya, offered to remove the prayer for perjury proceedings against WhatsApp, and file a revised petition. Non-substantiation of perjury was the issue in the petition, as per the court. Govindacharya was also represented by Virag Gupta. ‘Supreme Court is not the right forum’ Justice Bobde asked the petitioner’s lawyers why they had filed a perjury suit in the Supreme Court as it wasn’t the appropriate forum. He instead told them to file a Section 340 petition in the relevant court. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing WhatsApp and Facebook, also agreed and…
- Court Watch: Which Tech Policy Cases Are India’s Court’s Hearing this October? October 3, 2023
- Search and seizures carried out against journalists, satirists, activists: Here’s what happened October 3, 2023
- Airtel and Vodafone Idea in tough spot: TRAI issues 2.8 crore and 1 crore fine respectively for failure to curb spam October 3, 2023
- Broadband connections in the country rose by 0.78% in July: TRAI October 3, 2023
- TRAI doubles down on the need for an industry led body to regulate cloud services October 3, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
Factors like Indus not charging developers any commission for in-app payments and antitrust orders issued by India's competition regulator against Google could contribute to...
Is open-sourcing of AI, and the use cases that come with it, a good starting point to discuss the responsibility and liability of AI?...
RBI Deputy Governor Rabi Shankar called for self-regulation in the fintech sector, but here's why we disagree with his stance.
Straw man fallacy: IT Ministers’ defence of government exemptions in data protection law misses the point
Both the IT Minister and the IT Minister of State have chosen to avoid the actual concerns raised, and have instead defended against lesser...
The Central Board of Film Certification found power outside the Cinematograph Act and came to be known as the Censor Board. Are OTT self-regulating...
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...