wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SC dismisses Govindacharya’s petition accusing WhatsApp of perjury in the Pegasus Row

WhatsApp Supreme Court
WhatsApp Supreme Court

A Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, dismissed former RSS ideologue K.N. Govindacharya’s petition (W.P. (Crl) 324/2019) accusing WhatsApp of perjury for misleading the Supreme Court during the Facebook transfer petition “by claiming that users[‘] data is fully encrypted and no one including WhatsApp has the key”. However, Govindacharya has been given the liberty to refile. He had filed the petition against Facebook, WhatsApp, MeitY and Union of India in the Pegasus-NSO Group snooping row.

Govindacharya had filed a criminal writ petition asking the apex court to commence perjury proceedings against WhatsApp, and for a National Investigation Agency investigation and FIR against Facebook, WhatsApp and NSO Group under the Information technology Act, 2000, and Indian Penal Code, 1860.

‘Where is the proof of perjury?’ asks Court

The bench told the petitioner’s lawyers that for charges of perjury, they had not quoted from the submissions made in court. To that, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, on behalf of Govindacharya, offered to remove the prayer for perjury proceedings against WhatsApp, and file a revised petition. Non-substantiation of perjury was the issue in the petition, as per the court. Govindacharya was also represented by Virag Gupta.

‘Supreme Court is not the right forum’

Justice Bobde asked the petitioner’s lawyers why they had filed a perjury suit in the Supreme Court as it wasn’t the appropriate forum. He instead told them to file a Section 340 petition in the relevant court. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing WhatsApp and Facebook, also agreed and said that the Supreme Court was not the right forum.

Justice Bobde said that the Supreme Court was not a trial court. The bench asked the petitioner to go to the high court to which Singh asked how he could do that since all the related matters have been transferred to the Supreme Court.

Apart from Justice Bobde, the bench constituted of Justices B.R. Gavai and Surya Kant. The hearing lasted barely five minutes. Since this was the first hearing in the matter, notice hadn’t been issued to the respondents, but Rohatgi was there. MeitY and Union of India, the other two respondents in the petition, weren’t there.

Update: Appended court’s order on December 3 at 10:43 am.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.medianama.com/wp-content/uploads/Govindacharya-WhatsApp-Perjury-Order.pdf” download=”all”]

You May Also Like


The Supreme Court has dismissed petitions seeking review of the 2018 judgment that upheld the certification of the Aadhaar Act as a money bill,...


Digital sovereignty also involves the autonomy of Indians as far as ownership of that data is concerned, Ravi Shankar Prasad Union Minister for Electronics...


Mobile numbers and WhatsApp chats of people using WhatsApp web were indexed on Google search results yet again, a security researcher claimed. This came...


We missed this earlier: The Delhi High-Court on Monday told petitioners who challenged WhatsApps’ new privacy policy that users can choose to delete the...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to Daily Newsletter

    © 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ