wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Announcing Roundtable on Intermediary Liability: The Way Forward; Nov 22, 2019, Bangalore #Ad

MediaNama invites you to apply to attend our round-table discussion on the way forward for Intermediary Liability, being held in Bangalore on November 22nd (Fri) 2019.

You can apply here: http://bit.ly/il02bangalore

This follows a very sharp discussion we had in Delhi, looking at amendments to these rules and what they mean for platforms, citizens, and the Internet, and discussed scenarios in which proposed changes (details below) had been implemented. Read about those discussions here.

Why are we doing this? The Indian government has said that it will notify rules that will change the way Intermediaries (ISPs, cloud service providers, SAAS companies, Ad Networks, etc) by the 15th of January 2020.

This follows a case where traceability is potentially being enforced on online intermediaries, and MeitY’s consultation on proposed amendments to the Safe Harbour rules which cover Intermediary Liability. These rules contain due diligence processes for platforms to follow, in order to be not held liable for content that flows through them, and sought to expand these rules to include:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  • Traceability, and information within 72 hours. The new rules require platforms to introduce traceability to find where a piece of information originated. For this, platforms may have to break end-to-end encryption [Rule 3(5)].
  • Platforms with more than 50 lakh users are required to be registered under the Companies Act, have a physical address in the country, have a nodal officer who will cooperate with law enforcement agencies, etc [Rule 3(7)].
  • Platforms have to pull down unlawful content within a shorter duration of 24 hours from the earlier 36 hours. They also have to keep records of the “unlawful activity” for 180 days – double the period of 90 days in the 2011 rules – as required by the court or government agencies [Rule 3(8)].
  • Platforms have to deploy tools to proactively identify, remove and disable public access to unlawful information or content [Rule 3(9)].
  • The new rules insert a monthly requirement on platforms to inform users of the platforms’ right to terminate usage rights and to remove non-compliant information at their own discretion [Rule 3(4)].

At the same time, end-to-end encryption is under threat, with the governments of US, UK and Australia asking Facebook to not implement end to end encryption across their services. This is also in the context of:

  • The RBI looking to regulate payment aggregators (which are intermediaries),
  • The Delhi High Court ordering a global takedown of content in the Baba Ramdev case, and
  • The recent discussions of WhatsApp being hacked using the Pegasus software from the NSO group

Intermediary liability protections are important for the growth of the Internet. Encryption enables trust and safety in community. Our discussion will look at the status of end to end encryption, the status of the traceability case, the applicability of the safe harbor provisions and the proposed amendments to the rules.

This is an invite-only session, you can apply to attend here. Please feel free to suggest points of discussion and questions you think ought to be raised, in the application form.


  • Registration does not guarantee attendance. In case you fit our mandate for the intended audience, we’ll send you a confirmation on or before November 19th, 2019.
  • Your contact information will never be shared with anyone outside of MediaNama.

This is an advertisement for MediaNama’s event. MediaNama’s Native Advertising policy can be seen here, and past ads here. For advertising, contact sales@medianama.com. In case you’re interested in sponsoring our events, please contact harneet@medianama.com.

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?


After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples


In the case of the ‘deemed consent' provision in the draft data protection law, brevity comes at the cost of clarity and user protection


The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.


The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ