wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Right to be Forgotten: Delhi HC orders Google, Facebook to remove sexual harassment allegations against Subodh Gupta from search results

The Delhi High Court has ordered Facebook, Google, and Instagram to remove all posts, search results, and content containing ‘defamatory’ content content containing sexual harassment allegations against Indian artist Subodh Gupta, in an order dated September 18. The court has ordered that (see order below):

  • Two posts, from December 2018 and January 2019, containing allegations of sexual harassment against Gupta, be blocked or removed.
  • 9 news articles about either the allegations against Gupta or his subsequent resignation from Serendipity Arts Festival, be blocked or removed.
  • 7 Google Search result links pertaining to the allegations, such as ‘subodh gupta metoo’, ‘subodh gupta sexual harasser’, ‘subodh gupta sexual facebook’, and so on be blocked or removed. The 9 news articles mentioned above should also be blocked by Facebook and Google. This is the equivalent of a Right to be Forgotten order on the technology companies.

Over the last two hearings, held in September, the court has also asked Instagram to furnish the name of the account operator in a sealed envelope by the next hearing, scheduled for November 18. Gupta was accused of sexual harassment on an anonymous Instagram account in December 2018. The account posted a series of allegations against Gupta that contained ordeals of multiple unnamed women. The court has also restrained the Instagram account from posting any content relating to Gupta until the next hearing.

The order, passed by Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, said that the allegations cannot be permitted to be made in public domain without being backed by legal recourse”. If this is permitted, it would be “capable of mischief”, it added.

Facebook appeared in the case on September 30, and undertook to take down the Instagram posts and to provide further details of the account operator by the next hearing, per LiveLaw.

Gupta had filed a civil defamation suit stating that the allegations were false, and sought token damages of Rs 5 crore from the operator of the anonymous Instagram account, reports LiveLaw. The court order revealed that Gupta’s alleged victims haven’t been named in the posts, or been identified elsewhere, and they haven’t initiated any legal proceedings against Gupta.

Right to be Forgotten in India

The Right to be Forgotten is recognised in multiple jurisdictions, it allows people to demand erasure of their personal information from the internet. This right has its origin in right to reputation and right to privacy. Its also based on the idea that because the internet remembers forever, it doesn’t leave space for redemption or self-correction. In India, the right to be forgotten has not been formally recognised, but it’s a part of the Draft Personal Data Protection Bill, 2018. The bill provides for the right to restrict or prevent information disclosure, but not the right to erasure. Under the bill, an adjudicating officer will decide whether RTBF should be granted on the basis of sensitivity of the personal data involved, role of data owner in public life, the scale of information sought to be restricted, etc.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Cases in high courts

In a case in the Delhi HC, the petitioner had sought that Indian Kanoon and Google remove his name from their search results, as it was affecting his employment opportunities. He said the criminal case between his wife and mother kept showing up when people searched for his name online.

In another case in the Kerala HC, the petitioner had sought that Google should remove the hateful content posted by his wife, as it was causing humiliation to him and his children. The petitioner even cited the Google Span decision, where the European Court of Justice had ruled that Google needs to create a system for deletion of personal information.

Delhi HC order dated September 18, 2019:

[embeddoc url=”https://www.medianama.com/wp-content/uploads/delhi-hc-subodh-gupta-right-to-be-forgotten.pdf” download=”all”]

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I cover health, policy issues such as intermediary liability, data governance, internet shutdowns, and more. Hit me up for tips.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.


This article addresses the legal and practical ambiguities in understanding the complex crypto ecosystem in India.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ