What YouTube has said: It has removed a lot more content: YouTube claims that its June policy update against hate speech and supremacist content is working, it has removed 17,000 channels coming up to over 100,000 videos, both of which are 5x that of the last quarter. It has also removed over 500 million comments, which has doubled over the last quarter "in part due to a large increase in hate speech removals". Automation is working: YouTube also says that automated flagging is working, and that 87% of the 9 million videos removed in Q2 were first flagged by its automated systems. 80% of these were removed before a single person saw them. An update to its spam detection system in Q2 of 2019 led to a 50% increase in the number of channels removed for violating spam policies. Violative videos are removed before people see them: It is getting better at removing videos before they get views. 30,000 videos removed for hate speech over the last month got 3% of the views that knitting videos did (in the same period). 10,000 people across Google working with detecting, reviewing, and removing content. Views on violative videos reduce by 80% before removal: YouTube says that over the last 18 months, changes it made to its content policies and removal practices have reduced views on videos that are later removed for violating its policies by 80%. What was the June policy change? YouTube said it would be much more stern about hate…
- MediaNama Daily: It’s not you, it’s your data January 28, 2023
- Why is Google not fully complying with India’s orders, MapmyIndia CEO asks January 27, 2023
- Unique Identification Authority of India working on age verification through e-KYC January 27, 2023
- Views: Why India’s “indigenous” smartphone operating system BharOS is overhyped January 27, 2023
- Here’s why Twitter employees’ access to its ‘God Mode’ function is a problem January 27, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?
After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples
The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.
The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...