wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

IFF calls NCRB’s automatic facial recognition system ‘unfathomably detrimental to Indians’

On July 18, the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) sent a legal notice to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) for inviting bids for the implementation of Automated Facial Recognition Systems (AFRS). IFF also sent a letter and a copy of the notice to Home Minister Amit Shah and Home Secretary Rajiv Gauba, “highlighting the features and scope of the AFRS and its unfathomable detriment … to Indians if implemented”. MediaNama has reached out to NCRB for comment.

IFF’s argument

  • Absence of legality: No statutory or executive basis for the requirement of AFRS. It also violates privacy, and does not fulfil the three conditions (legality, legitimate state aim, and proportionality of the legitimate aim) necessary for violating privacy under the Puttaswamy judgement.
  • Manifest arbitrariness in the selection of a technical solution: As the system intends to combine the various databases available with state police across the country, and upload images from CCTV footage, newspapers, raids, sketches, etc., subjects of the images will not know. How their images are being used. As a result, there is no consent whatsoever. Studies have shown that algorithms replicate biases prevalent in society. Mis-identification and discriminatory profiling will become the norm.
  • Absence of any proportionality/safeguards: The RFP largely “delegates aspects of storage and access to the selected bidder and provides no concrete insight as to required limitations or restrictions or impact on the rights of individuals identified”.
  • Absence of safeguards and accountability: No overarching legal framework to protect informational privacy and no safeguards to regulate the technology and any resulting “mass surveillance and discriminatory dystopia” it could create.

In response to MediaNama’s queries, IFF sent the following response:

Our legal notice to the NCRB is on the basis of an evaluation of it’s [sic] legality and the grave threat to individual privacy. Our earnest hope is for a reconsideration given not only it is illegal but it is also causing widespread public concern. Cancelling this tender will help resolve this issue in line with our constitutional guarantees. To promote this conversation in addition to the notice we have also sent a letter to the Home Ministry to treat it as a representation. In the unfortunate event such an outcome is not achieved after receiving inputs from our teams of legal counsel we will examine all possibilities of challenge under law. IFF has in the past been a litigant and also assisted other litigants on core issues of digital rights. In such challenges we approach courts with care, often after exhausting consultative and cooperative frameworks to impact change. [emphasis ours]

NCRB’s call for bids for implementing AFRS defined the broad scope of work in fairly innocuous terms — “supply, installation and commissioning of hardware and software at NCRB” — but the detailed request for proposal (RFP) was anything but innocuous. The RFP stated that this “is an effort in the direction of modernising the police force, information gathering, criminal identification, verification and its dissemination among various police organisations and units across the country”.

This AFRS will be “a centralised web application hosted at the NCRB Data Centre in Delhi with DR in non-seismic zone which will be made available for access to all the police stations of the country”. It will be the foundation for “a national level searchable platform of facial images”.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Read more about NCRB’s Automatic Facial Recognition System and its request for proposal here.

***Updated (July 23, 2019 9:25 am): The article was updated with IFF’s response. This article was originally published on July 22, 2019.

Written By

Send me tips at aditi@medianama.com. Email for Signal/WhatsApp.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ