wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Govt may review tax regime of ESOPs, says finance ministry official: Report

The government will review the taxation regime of employees’ stock ownership plans (ESOPs), the Economic Times reported. ESOP is a compensation tool for employees, especially in start-ups and this review will likely address the effectiveness of the instrument. The heart of the matter here is whether stock options should be taxed only when the employee sells them, and not again at time of vesting. If an employee sells the stock option, taxation as per capital gains will be levied. If the stock option is sold during the vesting period, the perquisite value gets added to the income and tax is levied according to the prevalent slab.

ET also reported that the review will not be confined to start-ups and said that the finance ministry had examined a proposal by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) on this issue before the Union Budget but the view was that the entire framework needed to be reviewed.

Taxation of ESOPs

As of now, ESOPs are subject to a two-stage taxation under the Income Tax Act, 1961:

  • Upon allotment of shares after the employee exercises his option on the completion of the vesting period: The difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the shares on the date of exercise and the exercise/subscription price paid by the employee is taxable as perquisite under the head ‘Income from salary’ on the date of allotment of shares.
  • Upon allotment of shares to the employee: When the employee sells the shares, she/he will be taxed for capital gains. The capital gains is the difference between the sale proceeds and FMV of the shares that were already considered by the employer while computing the perquisite value. The employee can claim the expenditure that she/he may have incurred wholly in connection with the sale.

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



A viewpoint on why the regulation of cryptocurrencies and crypto exchnages under 2019's E-Commerce Rules puts it in a 'grey area'


India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...


There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data


Existing consumer protection regulations are not sufficient to cover the extent of protection that a crypto-investor would require.


The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ