wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

IRCTC takes RailYatri and TravelKhana to court over ‘unauthorised’ meal services; Our take

The Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) has approached two lower courts in Delhi, saying that the online food ordering services provided by RailYatri and TravelKhana are illegal, Business Standard reports, citing unnamed sources. In February, IRCTC said in a tweet that it didn’t support or encourage orders placed via “unauthorised aggregators” such as RailYatri and TravelKhana. It said that it wouldn’t be responsible for the quality of food or any other concerns, and recommend that passengers order their meals through its e-catering website or app.

TravelKhana sent MediaNama the following statement: “TravelKhana and IRCTC have been under the E-catering agreement signed between us in 2016. Some disputes appeared more than a year ago because of some arbitrary clauses and mechanisms applied by IRCTC from time to time and upon the whims and fancies of the officials managing this aspect of the business for them. These arbitrary clauses went over and beyond the agreement between IRCTC and Travelkhana as well as against the policy and the principles laid out by the Railway board initially for e-catering business. We could not quite comprehend the reasons thereof but in our limited understanding the work that we were doing was definitely harming a lot of vested interests in the IRCTC food ecosystem. Since the matter is sub judice it would be inappropriate for us to state anything on it till it reaches a conclusion.” We have also reached out to RailYatri for comment and will update this once they reply.

On April 23, we reported that RailYatri was seeking a licence from IRCTC to continue its train ticket booking services after the Delhi High Court ruled earlier that month that it was doing so illegally. The ruling was in response to a complaint filed by IRCTC in 2017. Now IRCTC is clamping down on the food services that RailYatri and TravelKhana offer train passengers, saying these are unauthorised as well.

Last December, Business Standard reported that IRCTC was in talks with food delivery platforms such as UberEats, Zomato, Foodpanda, and Swiggy, to deliver food on trains.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

MediaNama’s take

(Nikhil adds) Would IRCTC also determine that someone buying food from a platform or even outside a station be deemed as unauthorised service? In this case, no one is holding the railways accountable for food being delivered, and frankly, consumers should have the right to buy food from outside, just as they have the right to bring their own food. From a structural perspective, the person delivering the food in the train can be seen as delivering it on behalf of the train passenger.

Why should people be forced to only eat the food that the Railways is providing to them? There should be an unbundling of food from the Railways and consumers should be given sufficient choice. Why isn’t the Railways partnering with Travelkhana and RailYatri instead of suing them?

IRCTC’s high court battle with RailYatri

In 2017, IRCTC filed a complaint against RailYatri, alleging that it was providing train bookings illegally. IRCTC said the company was not registered with it as a principal service provider (PSP) or a retail service provider (RSP). PSPs are companies appointed by IRCTC to sell train tickets; each has several hundred RSPs working for it. Every RSP has a unique identification number to access IRCTC. RailYatri, IRCTC said, worked with RSPs to connect customers to IRCTC’s network using the RSP’s credentials, and charged customers a nominal access fee.

IRCTC said it was the only entity authorised by the Ministry of Railways to sell e-tickets, and that RSPs were delegated agents, who could not transact with third-party entities such as RailYatri. It also told the court that many of the firm’s customers had complained about not getting refunds for cancellations. Stelling Technologies, which owns RailYatri, claimed that it was only an online platform that facilitated interaction between the customer and the RSP. But the court ruled in IRCTC’s favour, saying, “[RailYatri] is neither a PSP nor an RSP and has no privity of contract with IRCTC. No money has been paid by Stelling Technologies to IRCTC to be involved in e-ticket booking or to be integrated in the IRCTC network, which according to this Court is a prerequisite… and for which integration fee and annual maintenance fee is required to be paid.”

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



By Rahul Rai and Shruti Aji Murali A little less than a year since their release, the Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules, 2020 is being amended....


By Anand Venkatanarayanan                         There has been enough commentary about the Indian IT...


By Rahul Rai and Shruti Aji Murali The Indian antitrust regulator, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has a little more than a decade...


By Stella Joseph, Prakhil Mishra, and Surabhi Prabhudesai The recent difference of opinions between the Government and Twitter brings to fore the increasing scrutiny...


This article is being posted here courtesy of The Wire, where it was originally published on June 17.  By Saksham Singh The St Petersburg paradox,...

You May Also Like


Airtel and Reliance Jio now account for as much as 65% of India’s total Mobile connections. BSNL has just 10%. While Reliance Jio and...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ