On Friday, the Indian Express reported that a court in Bangalore had passed temporary injunctions against 49 newspapers, TV stations and social media platforms, including Facebook and YouTube, barring them from "reporting false, malicious and derogatory” news about the BJP’s candidate from South Bangalore, 28-year-old Tejasvi Surya. The injunctions will remain in effect until May 27, after the general elections. The court passed the gag order on a plea filed by Surya, in which he claimed he had been falsely accused of sexual abuse. The court order read, “It appears that some prima-facie defamatory messages pertaining to [Surya] are in transit in the media… How all of a sudden these allegations against the plaintiff emerged immediately after he filed nomination for the general elections is questionable." What the court seems to have missed is that the platforms, whether YouTube or Facebook, are mere conduits to commentary, and the gag order means that they will have to scan billions of messages and videos, and take down speech; it effectively ignores that fact that intermediaries have protection from liability, and are not publishers. ‘Most pernicious form of censorship’ For precedent, the court cited a 1987 Karnataka High Court case (AK Subbaiah vs BN Garudachar), which said freedom of speech included the duty to not harm others with one’s speech. But in an editorial published today, the Indian Express wrote that the injunctions “amount to prior restraint, regarded as the most pernicious form of censorship” as it prevents the spreading of information about events…
- How state family database projects pose dangers of in-depth citizen profiling and exclusion? January 26, 2023
- MediaNama Daily: This Republic Day, let’s remember our rights January 26, 2023
- What Google is (and isn’t) changing in Android and Play Store to comply with India’s antitrust orders January 25, 2023
- One-size-fits-all rules won’t work for social media companies: SFLC’s Mishi Choudhary on IT Rules January 25, 2023
- Rajeev Chandrasekhar’s Plans For India Stack: 3 Key Points From His Speech January 25, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples
The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.
The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."
By Soujanya Sridharan and Dr. Sarayu Natarajan Platform work and data: the intersection Every time you use a ride-hailing app, the matching algorithm processes...
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...