wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

RBI says WhatsApp yet to comply with data localisation norms: Report

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said WhatsApp Pay, the messaging platform’s digital payment service, is yet to comply with its data localisation norms, the Times of India reported. RBI made the comments in an affidavit filed in the Supreme Court on Wednesday. The court had made the central bank a party to a writ petition filed by the Centre for Accountability and Systemic Change, an NGO, in January.

WhatsApp has been operating its WhatsApp Pay in beta mode for one million users since February 2018. In June 2018 WhatsApp said that though its payments feature was built on Facebook’s payments infrastructure, the parent company would not store any data pertaining to payments. But in July, Bloomberg reported that this had not allayed concerns about how WhatsApp would store user data. According to Bloomberg, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) asked WhatsApp and its partner banks to provide more details about the payments system. The ministry also asked the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) to check whether WhatsApp was fully compliant with its requirements, the report said.

WhatsApp’s updated privacy policy

In an update to its terms of service and privacy policy on payments last June, WhatsApp made several clarifications about the information it collects through its payments service. The company said that it has limited visibility on the Indian consumer’s banking details. It stated clearly that it does not have access to the user’s UPI PIN, which is used to authenticate transactions, as the PIN is encrypted by software provided by the National Payment Corporation of India (NPCI). It said it only collects the UPI PIN to enable payments.

With regard to data collection by Facebook, WhatsApp said it “works with service providers including Facebook” to send payment instructions, maintain transaction history, provide customer support, and “keep our services safe and secure.” It again clarified that Facebook has no access to the UPI PIN, as it is encrypted.

The localisation mandate for payments data: A timeline

April 6, 2018: The RBI mandated all payments system operators in India to ensure that data related to payment systems operated by them be stored in the country, and gave companies six months to comply. The RBI wanted data stored locally “in order to have unfettered access to all payment data for supervisory purposes”.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

July 12: The Finance Ministry eased the RBI’s directive for foreign payment firms, saying that mirroring a copy of the data in India would be enough, instead of requiring storing the data only locally.
Payments companies breathed a sigh of relief, and assumed that the Finance Ministry’s directive stands, and that it would be okay to mirror user data in India. The companies were awaiting a circular from the central bank to this effect.
However, the RBI’s did not issue any such circular, which became a concern for global payment companies.

July 27: The long-awaited draft Data Protection Bill 2018 was submitted to the government; it added an another layer of confusion to the matter. The bill reportedly overrode all sectoral regulators and therefore all their directives. The bill mandated that all data fiduciaries store a copy of users’ personal data in India and worryingly, it also required mandatory storage of ‘critical personal data’ within India only. The bill, however, failed to state explicitly the definition of ‘critical data’.
September 6: RBI asked payment companies to send it fortnightly updates on the progress made on storage of payment system data in India.

October 15: The RBI’s circular on localisation of payments data came into effect.

February 2019: The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade released India’s Draft Ecommerce Policy, which included strategies for regulating access to data, mandating data storage requirements, and controlling cross-border data flows.

What the draft e-commerce policy says about data localisation

In February the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade released India’s Draft Ecommerce Policy, which addressed data localisation among many other issues. Here’s what it said:

“A business entity that collects or processes any sensitive data in India and stores it abroad, shall be required to adhere to the following conditions:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  • All such data stored abroad shall not be made available to other business entities outside India, for any purpose, even with the customer consent
  • All such data stored abroad shall not be made available to a third party, for any purpose, even if the customer consents to it
  • All such data stored abroad shall not be made available to a foreign government, without the prior permission of Indian authorities
  • A request from Indian authorities to have access to all such data stored abroad, shall be complied with immediately
  • Any violation of the conditions mentioned above shall face the prescribed consequences (to be formulated by the Government).”

“Restrictions on cross-border flows of data shall not apply to the following:

  • Data that is not collected in India
  • B2B data sent to India as part of a commercial contract between a business entity located outside India and an Indian business entity
  • Software and cloud computing services involving technology-related data flows, which have no personal or community implications
  • MNCs moving data across borders… internal to the company and its ecosystem, and does not contain data that has been generated by users in India from various sources, including e-commerce platforms, social media activities, search engines etc.”

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...


There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data


Existing consumer protection regulations are not sufficient to cover the extent of protection that a crypto-investor would require.


The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ