wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Lowdown on TRAI’s telecom tariff amendments: Reporting requirement, predatory pricing, non-discrimination & more

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has amended the regulatory principles for assessing how telecom service providers (TSPs) set tariffs for the services they provide, in order to ensure that transparency is maintained, as well as to prevent discrimination and predatory pricing in telecommunication services. These amendments specifically address reporting requirements, guiding principles for checking transparency in tariff offers, definition of non-discrimination, adherence to the principle of non-predatory pricing, definition of predatory pricing, relevant market, and assessment of significant market power (SMP) among others. Timeline of events leading to these amendments: TRAI had released a consultation paper titled 'Regulatory Principles of Tariff Assessment', in February last year. Following which, an open-house discussion was held in New Delhi in May 2017. In June 2017, TRAI met with the CEOs of telecom service providers to decide on "setting some form of floor price for retail tariff." And again in July 2017 to further discuss the same issue, during which "the majority view was that as of now, TRAI should not undertake fixation of floor price, and the IUC should not be taken as a floor for retail tariff." Lowdown of the amendments To begin with, TRAI says that 'Distinct Telecommunication Services' include: Wireline Access Service Wireless Access Service National Long Distance Service International Long Distance Service Any other telecommunication service for which licence is granted Non-predation & Predatory pricing One of the key elements of this latest amendment is non-predation. TRAI defines non-predation as "not indulging in predatory pricing by a service provider…

Please subscribe/login to read the full story.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.

Views

News

Factors like Indus not charging developers any commission for in-app payments and antitrust orders issued by India's competition regulator against Google could contribute to...

News

Is open-sourcing of AI, and the use cases that come with it, a good starting point to discuss the responsibility and liability of AI?...

News

RBI Deputy Governor Rabi Shankar called for self-regulation in the fintech sector, but here's why we disagree with his stance.

News

Both the IT Minister and the IT Minister of State have chosen to avoid the actual concerns raised, and have instead defended against lesser...

News

The Central Board of Film Certification found power outside the Cinematograph Act and came to be known as the Censor Board. Are OTT self-regulating...

You May Also Like

News

Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

Advert

135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...

News

By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

News

Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Name:*
Your email address:*
*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ