wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Something unusual about the Internet Shutdown in Jaipur over the weekend

The Internet was shut down in Jaipur in Rajasthan, for the weekend, from 6AM on Saturday to 11.59 PM on Sunday, “to check rumours from spreading”, following the instance of a traffic scuffle escalating to a conflict between police and citizens in an area, reports the Indian Express. The order has been issued by the district administration, as per the report. The Financial Express adds that the ban hasn’t been lifted in its entirety: it remains for 14 of 64 police stations.

According to the Internet Shutdown Tracker from the SFLC.in, there have been 5 other shutdowns in Rajasthan this year, taking the tally to 6 so far. Rajasthan has had the second highest number of Internet Shutdowns, at 13, followed by Haryana, at 10. The highest has been in Jammu & Kashmir, at 49 shutdowns so far. What’s also interesting is that of the 106 shutdowns listed on the site, none have been implemented south of Maharashtra.

Some points:

1. Can the district administration still order an Internet shutdown? The shutdown was ordered by a district administration, according to the Indian Express report. According to our analysis of the rules, at the state government level, the Secretary to the State Government in-charge of the Home Department can issue an order in the case of a State Government. In unavoidable circumstances, this might be issued by Joint Secretary authorised by the State Home Secretary, subject to the review of the State Home Secretary within 24 hours. So, is the process being followed? Did they not get a copy of the notification? The Financial Express report cites the Divisional Commissioner Rajeshwar Singh as saying that the ban will continue in the 14 police stations till September 11th.

2. Area-specific banning: There appears to be a fair degree of specificity in shutting down Internet Access here. The fact that it was initially suspended in 64 police stations, and then reinstated in 50 suggests that there is a possibility of there not being a blanket ban on Internet access across cities or towns in the future, and bans can be more targeted. Two ways of looking at this:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  • Greater specificity in Internet Shutdowns means that all don’t have to suffer. Internet Shutdowns, in general, are disproportionate punishments: if there is a localised problem, the shutdown can impact those who aren’t even in the same area as the curfew. Greater specificity, area-wise, can allow for a more localised approach when the situation demands it.
  • Greater specificity also lends itself to reduced awareness of shutdowns: it’s when a large population is impacted that we tend to find out about shutdowns. The rules from the Indian Government, created without any public consultation, had no provisions for pro-active disclosures from the government.

This comes a few days after the Committee to Protect Journalists criticised the Indian government for sweeping rules regarding Internet Shutdowns, with Steven Butler, CPJ Asia program coordinator from Washington D.C. saying that “These blackouts amount to a severe form of censorship that deprives journalists of a key platform for gathering and disseminating news, and the country’s citizens of vital access to news and information.”

At our discussion on Internet Shutdowns last year, Subho Ray, president of industry association IAMAI, had said that “…if you’re giving an SP of a district 300 armed guards with the power to fire at people I don’t in principle believe that the guy doesn’t have the power to shut down the Internet in that district.” That’s a fair point, and there are no easy answers here.

Written By

Founder @ MediaNama. TED Fellow. Asia21 Fellow @ Asia Society. Co-founder SaveTheInternet.in and Internet Freedom Foundation. Advisory board @ CyberBRICS

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



India and US come to terms on how to deal with the equalisation levy in light of the impending Global Tax Deal.


Find out how people’s health data is understood to have value and who can benefit from that value.


The US and other countries' retreat from a laissez-faire approach to regulating markets presents India with a rare opportunity.


When news that Walmart would soon accept cryptocurrency turned out to be fake, it also became a teachable moment.


The DSCI's guidelines are patient-centric and act as a data privacy roadmap for healthcare service providers.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ