wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Flipkart buys Jabong, and everything is cool


Presidents go to war and companies buy others when the news cycle turns against them.

In the case of Flipkart and Jabong, though, it’s an aggregation of bad news that should perhaps change for a while, as the world celebrates Indian ecommerce’s most fashionable marriage: via its own fashion business Myntra, Flipkart has acquired fashion commerce company Jabong for as little as $70 million in cash. Rocket Internet has sold Jabong via its fashion commerce conglomerate Global Fashion Group (GFG), and the low valuation hints at a desperation to wash its hands off the entire business.

This ends months of speculation about the two companies, but apart from the fact that the deal that has taken place, there is little else that they have added: will they retain their separate identities, as Jabong and Myntra? How much was Jabong bought for? Only some data points have been shared: that the two have a combined monthly active user base of  15 million; Jabong has 1500 brands, and over a thousand sellers.

Earlier the Economic Times had reported that Jabong’s asking price was between $250-300 million, and the company had been in talks with Snapdeal, Aditya Birla Group-backed abof.com (what a terrible name), and even Amazon.

But is everything cool?

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

1. Valuations: Flipkart’s bad news, is frankly, irrelevant and far too many pageviews have been generated for it: Its valuation has been marked down, down, down this past year, but the true valuation will only be determined by the next buyer. Valuation lies in the eyes of the buyer. Rocket Internet itself marked Jabong parent GFG down by 68% when it put in €300 million it put in April.

2. Corporate governance issues wiped clean with the sale: does the sale of Jabong address the allegations of corporate governance issues that have been raised in the recent past? Earlier this month, The Ken pointed towards allegations in a leaked report, which pointed of conflict of interest in how a company incubated within Jabong, called GoJavas, was sold eventually to Snapdeal. The same report (of which MediaNama has a copy), also alleges issues related to conflict of interest in technology deals, unusually low pricing rebates in disposal of goods returned by buyers (or believed to be returned by buyers). None of it is proven, of course, but the thing is: it probably never will be. GFG probably won’t want to have anything to do with the company, now that it has been sold. Flipkart won’t want to raise an issue in a company that has just been bought. Not their problem. If there was an issue, then someone just got away. Life goes on.Another question to be asked: is Rocket Internet going to exit India?

Jabong Financials (end of March 2016, i.e. Q1 2016)


– Revenues: Rs 243.78 crore in Q1, up 14% year-on-year (YoY) from Rs 213.87 crore Q1 2015, and 11.55% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) from Rs 218.53 crore in Q4 2015.
– Gross profit for Q1 2016): Rs 1.49 crore, up from a loss of Rs 11.21 crore in Q1 2015)
– Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) of Rs 410.54 crore for Q1 2016, up 8.4% from Rs 378.38 crore in Q1 2015, up 8.7% from Rs 377.73 crore in the previous sequential quarter.

(Updates: fixed formatting and deleted an irrelevant sentence. Added Jabong valuation)

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

Founder @ MediaNama. TED Fellow. Asia21 Fellow @ Asia Society. Co-founder SaveTheInternet.in and Internet Freedom Foundation. Advisory board @ CyberBRICS

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Do we have an enabling system for the National Data Governance Framework Policy (NDGFP) aiming to create a repository of non-personal data?


A viewpoint on why the regulation of cryptocurrencies and crypto exchnages under 2019's E-Commerce Rules puts it in a 'grey area'


India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...


There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data


Existing consumer protection regulations are not sufficient to cover the extent of protection that a crypto-investor would require.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ