wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Apple to fight court order asking it to unlock iPhone in the US



Yesterday the FBI filed an order asking Apple to unlock the iPhone used by Tashfeen Malik, one of the attackers in the San Bernardino shooting incident, reports TechCrunch. The order is based on a 227 year old All Writs Act, which gives courts power to issue orders that do not fall under a pre-existing law.

In response Tim Cook published a letter on Apple’s website, that said that the company would challenge the order. Essentially, Cook mentions that it has already provided law agencies with what it could, and to unlock the phone further, it would have to update its operating system to allow access. This would essentially create a backdoor OS for iOS devices, which could then be theoretically used to unlock any iPhone.

Apple recently introduced a pin authentication which automatically wipes user data on a certain number of unsuccessful tries. Malik’s phone uses this feature, and to disable it, Apple will essentially have to create an alternate operating system that bypasses this security measure, and push it as an update. However, this code could then be used to unlock other iPhones as well, and it would be extremely hard to limit it to one device.

Complying with the ruling would also set a precedent for unlocking secure devices, and by extension, undermining encryption. According to Cook, the Government could “extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.”

Support for Apple: While slow to come, on the prompting of Edward Snowden among others, Google CEO Sundar Pichai also tweeted in support of Apple.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella also retweeted out Microsoft chief legal officer Brad Smith’s tweet in favour of Apple.

Similarly, the Electronics Frontier Foundation came out in support for Apple, citing “the government is asking Apple to create a master key so that it can open a single phone. And once that master key is created, we’re certain that our government will ask for it again and again, for other phones, and turn this power against any software or device that has the audacity to offer strong security. Once this master key is created, governments around the world will surely demand that Apple undermine the security of their citizens as well.”

Also read: Why Tim Cook is right to call court-ordered iPhone hack a “backdoor”

About the All Writs Act: The law, instituted in 1789, was previously used in 1977 when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government to compel a telecom company to help it conduct surveillance to make a racketeering sting. Basically, as Gizmodo describes, it provides “the court-order version of a blank check” to judges.

MediaNama’s take: The court has essentially asked Apple to undermine its own security measures, and Apple is justified in wanting to fight it out. The move could set a precedent where various Governments around the world start asking Apple to do the same, or even use the newly created exploit to access other iPhones; eventually culminating to manufacturers required to build backdoor into production models of pretty much any device.

Image source: Perspecsys Photos under CC BY-SA 2.0

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The DSCI's guidelines are patient-centric and act as a data privacy roadmap for healthcare service providers.


In this excerpt from the book, the authors focus on personal data and autocracies. One in particular – Russia.  Autocracies always prioritize information control...


By Jai Vipra, Senior Resident Fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy The use of new technology, including facial recognition technology (FRT) by police...


By Stella Joseph, Prakhil Mishra, and Yash Desai The Government of India circulated proposed amendments to the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 (“E-Commerce Rules”) which...


By Rahul Rai and Shruti Aji Murali A little less than a year since their release, the Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules, 2020 is being amended....

You May Also Like


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ