wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Arrests over “objectionable content” on Facebook back despite Sec 66A being scrapped

facebook page not available

In two separate incidents, eight persons in Uttar Pradesh were arrested over posting “objectionable content” on social networking website Facebook last week.

The Times of India reports that seven people were arrested in Bahraich district as one Vipul Singh had posted “objectionable content”  and the others had liked and commented on the same. They were arrested  following an FIR filed by supporters of the Bahujan Samajwadi Party (BSP) and were booked under the sections 153B, 295A, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The above sections deal with hate speech in the country as they sought to promote “disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities.”

The report further states that police would also consider invoking the National Security Act (NSA) would be invoked against people accused of spreading communal tension and added that guidelines had been sought from the state government for invoking NSA in earlier cases.

Meanwhile in Sambhal district, the Press Trust of India reports one Navneet Varshney was arrested for sharing “objectionable” post on social networking site Facebook against Samajwadi Party leader Shafiqur Rehman Burq. Again, he was booked under the sections 153 A, 505, and 504 of the IPC which deals with hate speech.

It’s worth noting that in earlier in March this year, a class 12 student was arrested in Uttar Pradesh for commenting against Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan. The student was booked under Sections 153A , 504 and 505 of the IPC and Secton 66A of the IT Act. Later in April, the Section 66A charge was dropped following the  Supreme Court’s decision that it was unconstitutional. However, proceedings under the other charges remained against the student.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Our take

We had mentioned earlier that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) was seriously considering bringing back Section 66A of the IT Act, 2008 albeit in a slightly different avatar. However, it seems that leaders in Uttar Pradesh have found a workaround over Section 66A and have used the existing laws on hate speech and extended it to social networks as well.

According to the Section 153A of the IPC:

Whoever (a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility, . . . shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Perhaps the hate speech laws of the IPC need to be amended so as to ensure that they are not abused by those in power. After all, ‘liking’ a post on Facebook is not the same as writing, speaking hate speech, it is merely endorsing a point of view. Also, often on social networks, people share memes whose origin cannot be traced and sharing the post does not mean that a person wrote it or created it.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.


This article addresses the legal and practical ambiguities in understanding the complex crypto ecosystem in India.


It is widely argued that the PDP Bill report seeks to discard the intermediary status of social media platforms but that may not be...


Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ