A two judge bench of the Supreme Court, comprising of Justice Chelameswar and Bobde, hearing multiple cases challenging sections linked to the IT Act, observed yesterday that Section 66A of the Information Technology Act (download) - provisions related to which had been called vague, unconstitutional, and beyond the ambit of Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India which provides reasonable restrictions on free speech only chills you from saying something offensive (on the Internet). The court hasn't finished hearing the arguments, and the comments made don't necessarily have any bearing on the final judgment. Following arguments made Sajan Poovayya, representing Rajya Sabha MP Rajeev Chandrasekhar, which suggested that the provisions are such that even following community standards will have a chilling effect on free speech, since every community has different standards and (almost) all communities are present on the Internet, the vagueness of the provisions will have a chilling effect on Free Speech (and lead to self censorship), Justice Bobde observed that "this law chills you from saying something offensive. You are not talking to your community, you are talking to the world community. Someone talking to the United Nations will have different approach to (saying something in) a drawing room. This is a vexed issue. In all the arguments, the injunction to be careful is being seen as an injunction to be quiet. Free speech is not the right to say what you want. If a law requires a person to be careful, it is not violative of free…
- Why did the Delhi High Court restrict use of Amitabh Bachchan’s image and voice? November 25, 2022
- Why did an Indian exchange, CoinDCX, publish its Proof of Reserves days after releasing its R2L ratio? November 25, 2022
- DPDP Bill, 2022 Has Received Good Response From Stakeholders: MeitY’s Ashwini Vaishnaw November 25, 2022
- Twitter Blocks Tweet of CJ Werleman’s YouTube Show Discussing Police Violence Against Indian Muslims November 25, 2022
- Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) says verify Aadhaar as ID proof using QR November 25, 2022
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
The Structure and Style of a Dogma Community: Conspiracy theories and organized Twitter engagement on Sushant Singh Rajput
Studying the 'community' supporting the late Sushant Singh Rajput (SSR) shows how Twitter was gamed through organized engagement
Do we have an enabling system for the National Data Governance Framework Policy (NDGFP) aiming to create a repository of non-personal data?
A viewpoint on why the regulation of cryptocurrencies and crypto exchnages under 2019's E-Commerce Rules puts it in a 'grey area'
India's IT Rules mandate a GAC to address user 'grievances' , but is re-instatement of content removed by a platform a power it should...
Why ‘group privacy’ should be recognised, and how ‘non-personal’ data becomes a regulatory blindspot
There is a need for reconceptualizing personal, non-personal data and the concept of privacy itself for regulators to effectively protect data
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...