wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Maharashtra Police warns against liking “objectionable” posts on Facebook

Maharashtra police plans to take action against people who “like” objectionable posts pertaining to Chhatrapati Shivaji, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar and the late Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray on Facebook, reports The Times Of India.

Nanded police have told the publication that these people would be booked under the Section 66 (a) of the IT Act and under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The report says the police have also applied Section 295 (a) of the IPC which deals with “hurting religious sentiments”.

This follows protests over alleged morphed photos of Chhatrapati Shivaji, late Shiv Sena head Bal Thackeray and and Hindu gods which reportedly appeared on Facebook over the weekend and were later re-circulated on WhatsApp. These protests also apparently led to the death of Pune techie who was allegedly killed by the protest mob.

Arrest for liking a post?

What’s strange and worrying here is the fact that Maharashtra Police doesn’t seem understand there is a difference between liking a post and commenting on it. We feel there is nothing illegal or criminal about liking someone else’s updates, since in no way does it change the statement made by some one else. Even sharing a post does not amount to modifying it, only to its distribution.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

This reminds us of a similar case in November 2012, wherein a person was arrested for “liking” a friend’s update about Bal Thackeray on Facebook. This is exactly what the government clarification on Section 66A sought to address, but it appears that Maharashtra Police has its own ideas.

Earlier this month, we also witnessed two incidents of arrest: an MBA student was arrested for allegedly sending an “offensive message” on WhatsApp while another person in Mumbai was arrested for posting on the Goa+ Facebook Group, that if elected to power, Modi would unleash a ‘holocaust’.

These arrests could lead to people having a significantly lower propensity to voice criticism and dissent and make fun of developments in a public forum.

(with inputs from Brindaalakshmi K)

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.


This article addresses the legal and practical ambiguities in understanding the complex crypto ecosystem in India.


It is widely argued that the PDP Bill report seeks to discard the intermediary status of social media platforms but that may not be...


Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ