wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

, , , ,

Submit your views: Media & Internet Laws in India being looked at by Law Commission

The Law Commission of India, as a part of a process looking into the laws pertaining to the governance of media in India, is also taking a look issues related to Social media and privacy, apart from cross media ownership, paid news, fake sting operations, trial by media and regulation of government owned media.

You may download the consultation paper here, and submit your views to lci-dla@nic.in. The paper was released around the 20th of May, so you should get yor submissions in latest by the 10th of June.

Once ready, MediaNama will publish its submission to the Law Commission, for your reference. We had submitted our views to the Standing Committee on IT on the issue of Paid News (download), which you can refer to here.

Questions that the Law Commission is looking into:

A. Social Media and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

1. Should the existing law be amended to define what constitutes “objectionable content”?
2. Should Section 66A of the IT Act be retained in its present form or should it be modified/ repealed?
3. Is there a need for a regulatory authority with powers to ban/suspend coverage of objectionable material? If yes, should the regulatory authority be self-regulatory or should it have statutory powers?

B. Cross Media Ownership

1. Is there a current need for restrictions on cross control/ownership across the media sector? If so, what shape should such restrictions take?
2. Are mergers and acquisitions guidelines necessary for the sector to regulate concentration of media ownership? If so, what are the key factors such regulations must capture?
3. Do mandatory disclosure norms need to be imposed on media entities?
4. Should certain categories of entities be restricted from entering into broadcasting activities?

C. Media and Individual Privacy

1. Should a statutory body have powers to adjudicate complaints of false sting operations? Should there be a specific statutory provision for treating false sting operations as a punishable offence?
2. Should the existing framework of laws be suitably amended to include specific guidelines governing disclosure of private information by the press?
3. Is there a need for detailed guidelines on reporting of sub judice matters?
4. Is the current definition of “Identifiable larger public interest” under the Cable TV Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 comprehensive?

D. Regulation of the Media
1. Do the existing self-regulation mechanisms require strengthening? If so, how can they be strengthened?

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

2. In the alternative should a statutory regulator be contemplated? If so, how can the independence of such regulator be guaranteed? Specifically:

  1. How should members of such regulator be appointed?
  2. What should the eligibility conditions of such members be?
  3. What should their terms of service be?
  4. How should they be removed?
  5. What should their powers be?
  6. What consequences will ensue if their decisions are not complied with?

3. Should any such change be uniform across all types of media or should regulators be medium-specific?

E. Paid News
1. Should paid news be included as an election offence under the Representation of the People Act, 1951? How should it be defined?
2. What enforcement mechanisms should be put in place to monitor and restrict the proliferation of paid news?

F. Opinion Polls
1. Do opinion polls require any kind of regulation? If so, what kind?
2. What are the reasons for seeking such regulation, if any?
3. Will such regulation be constitutionally valid?

G. Trial by Media and Rights of the Accused

1. What form of regulation, if at all, is required to restrict media reporting of sub-judice matters?
2. Should the application of postponement orders be narrowed down by introducing guidelines/parameters such as kinds of publications to be covered, categories of proceedings which may be covered?
3. If some form of media regulation is required in reporting of matters which are sub-judice, should the same be in the form of a self-regulated media or should the Courts apply the present law of contempt to check such prejudicial publications?

H. Defamation
1. Should there be modifications in the law of civil and criminal defamation as it applies to journalists? If so, what should these modifications be?

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

I. Publications and Contempt of Court

1. What are the further legislative or Constitutional amendments necessary to the law on contempt of court to ensure freedom of the press?
2. Should scandalising or tending to scandalise the Court continue as a ground for contempt of court?

J. Regulations surrounding government owned media
1. What regulations can be introduced to ensure independence of government-owned media?
2. How should such regulations be enforced?

Note that the freedom of the press, while not recognised as a separate freedom under Fundamental Rights, is covered by the freedom of speech and expression. However, though the need for “registration” of media businesses, control over FDI spends, and media dependence on DAVP spends (now online as well), offers the government some strings to pull when needed. This consultation process by the Law Commission could be used as justification for changes in law in the future, so do submit your answers.

Our previous submissions

– On Paid News, to the Standing Committee on IT (download)
– On FDI in Ecommerce, to the DIPP (download)
– Mobile VAS, to the TRAI (view)

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Written By

Founder @ MediaNama. TED Fellow. Asia21 Fellow @ Asia Society. Co-founder SaveTheInternet.in and Internet Freedom Foundation. Advisory board @ CyberBRICS

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



When news that Walmart would soon accept cryptocurrency turned out to be fake, it also became a teachable moment.


The DSCI's guidelines are patient-centric and act as a data privacy roadmap for healthcare service providers.


In this excerpt from the book, the authors focus on personal data and autocracies. One in particular – Russia.  Autocracies always prioritize information control...


By Jai Vipra, Senior Resident Fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy The use of new technology, including facial recognition technology (FRT) by police...


By Stella Joseph, Prakhil Mishra, and Yash Desai The Government of India circulated proposed amendments to the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 (“E-Commerce Rules”) which...

You May Also Like


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ