wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Social Media Will Be Tricky For India’s Election Commission To Deal With

With elections in several Indian states nearing, and national elections planned next year, India’s Election Commission has said that it is going to keep an eye on politicians usage of Social Media, to ensure that they will not flout the model code of conduct, reports the Times of India.

This is particularly relevant since many political parties – especially the BJP and the Aam Aadmi Party, use social media as a key means of reaching out to voters, or even communicating with the press. Many have set up IT Cells for managing communication on social media – the BJP being the first to do so. Readers might remember that current Samajwadi Party CM Akhilesh Yadav had interacted with voters on Facebook during the elections in Uttar Pradesh, and even livestreamed his oath-taking ceremony on Facebook page, and its YouTube and DailyMotion.

At a state level, the terms of the legislative assemblies of Delhi, Rajasthan, Mizoram and Madhya Pradesh are set to expire in December 2013, while that of the Chhatisgarh assembly will expire in the first week of January 2014. The national elections are expected early in the second quarter of next year.

Social Media will be tricky for the Election Commission, and we wonder if it understands what exactly it is up against:

– Tracking advertising expenditure: ToI quotes chief election officer Umesh Sinha as saying that “expenditure incurred on advertisements through social media will also be in the purview of Election Commission’s monitoring committee and candidates hiding the same will face EC action”.

Unlike advertisements in traditional media outlets, wherein expenditure can be tracked, tracking expenditure on the Internet is tricky. Much of it is dynamic – based on number of clicks and impressions, and merely displaying an advertisement doesn’t mean that money has been spent. They will need to rely on official party statements of spends on Facebook and Twitter. Even then, where most political parties have teams to manage content and conversations, it becomes even more tricky, because the communication on Social Media is not paid, unless they promote posts (on facebook), and use promoted tweets or trends on Twitter. So how will the Election Commission attribute spends to mere statements on these free-to-speak platforms?

– What about the armies of fans? Social media is full – and overflowing – with supporters of political parties, and these armies of supporters have been drowning out many a conversation, leading up to elections. Does the election commission then view tweets by followers and supporters as a part of a parties campaign? It is unlikely. Even if, beyond the dates that campaigning ends, followers continue to pitch for their favored candidate, would that violate the code of conduct?

The Election Commission can’t clamp down on social media platforms during the days leading up to the elections, because that has serious implications for freedom of expression, and the collateral damage would extend to people who don’t want to tweet or update about politics, and merely want communicate with friends.


Meanwhile, the guidelines that the Election Commission has announced today for the mainstream media are, well, not of the Internet era:

Section 126 of the Representation of the People, 1951, prohibits displaying any election matter by means, inter alia, of television or similar apparatus, during the period of 48 hours before the hour fixed for conclusion of poll in a constituency. The relevant portions of the said Section 126 are re-produced below: –
(126. Prohibition of public meeting during period of forty-eight hours ending with hour fixed for conclusion of poll-

(1)No person shall –
(a) ………………….
(b) Display to the public any election matter by means of cinematograph, television or other similar apparatus;
(c) …………………….
In any polling area during the period of forty-eight hours ending with the hour fixed for the conclusion of the poll for any election in the polling area.
(2) Any person who contravenes the provisions of sub-section (1) shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
(3) In this Section, the expression “election mater” means any matter intended or calculated to influence or affect the result of an election.)

2. During elections, there are sometimes allegations of violation of the provisions of the above Section 126 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 by TV channels in the telecast of their panel discussions/debates and other news and current affairs programmes. The Commission has clarified in the past that the said Section 126 prohibits displaying any election matter by means, inter alia, of television or similar apparatus, during the period of 48 hours ending with the hour fixed for conclusion of poll in a constituency. “Election matter” has been defined in that Section as any matter intended or calculated to influence or affect the result of an election. Violation of the aforesaid provisions of Section 126 is punishable with imprisonment upto a period of two years, or with fine or both.

3. In this connection, attention is also invited to Section 126A of the R.P. Act 1951, which prohibits conduct of Exit poll and dissemination of their results during the period mentioned therein, in the hour fixed for commencement of polls in the first phase and half hour after the time fixed for close of poll for the last phase in all the States.

4. The Commission once again reiterates that the TV/Radio channels and cable networks should ensure that the contents of the programme telecast/broadcast/displayed by them during the period of 48 hours referred to in Section 126 do not contain any material, including views/appeals by panelists/participants that may be construed as promoting/prejudicing the prospect of any particular party or candidate(s) or influencing/affecting the result of the election.

5. During the period not covered by Section 126 or Section 126A, concerned TV/Radio/Cable/FM channels are free to approach the state/district/local authorities for necessary permission for conducting any broadcast related events which must also conform to the provisions of the model code of conduct and the programme code laid down by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting under the Cable Network (Regulation) Act with regard to decency, maintenance of communal harmony, etc. They are also required to stay within the provisions of Commission’s guidelines dated 27th August, 2012 regarding paid news and related matters. Concerned Chief Electoral Officer/District Election Officer will take into account all relevant aspects including the law and order situation while extending such permission.

6. Attention of all media is also drawn to the following guidelines issued by Press Council of India to follow for observance during the election:

(i) It will be the duty of the Press to give objective reports about elections and the candidates. The newspapers are not expected to indulge in unhealthy election campaigns, exaggerated reports about any candidate/party or incident during the elections. In practice, two or three closely contesting candidates attract all the media attention. While reporting on the actual campaign, a newspaper may not leave out any important point raised by a candidate and make an attack on his or her opponent.

(ii) Election campaign along communal or caste lines is banned under the election rules. Hence, the Press should eschew reports, which tend to promote feelings of enmity or hatred between people on the ground of religion, race, caste, community or language.

(iii) The Press should refrain from publishing false or critical statements in regard to the personal character and conduct of any candidate or in relation to the candidature or withdrawal of any candidate or his candidature, to prejudice the prospects of that candidate in the elections. The Press shall not publish unverified allegations against any candidate/party.

(iv) The Press shall not accept any kind of inducement, financial or otherwise, to project a candidate/party. It shall not accept hospitality or other facilities offered to them by or on behalf of any candidate/party.

(v) The Press is not expected to indulge in canvassing of a particular candidate/party. If it does, it shall allow the right of reply to the other candidate/party.

(vi) The Press shall not accept/publish any advertisement at the cost of public exchequer regarding achievements of a party/government in power.

(vii) The Press shall observe all the directions/orders/instructions of the Election Commission/Returning Officers or Chief Electoral Officer issued from time to time.

The above guidelines should be duly observed for compliance by all the concerned media.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like


The Polish government is planning to ban social media companies from blocking accounts. A draft law in the country will make it illegal for...


Twitter’s head Jack Dorsey says that while de-platforming outgoing President of the United States Donald Trump was the right decision, it sets a dangerous...


Update on January 8: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the platform is banning Donald Trump’s account “indefinitely”, since the “risks of allowing the...


After consenting to multiple contempt of court proceedings for social media posts in the recent past, Attorney General KK Venugopal has said that curbing...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to Daily Newsletter

    © 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ