So it's taken two years for the Indian Government to clarify what it meant by the IT Rules. It's a we-said-this-but-actually-we-meant-something-else moment for the Department of Information Technology. A notification put up recently on the website of the Department of Electronics and Information Technology states that when the government said in the IT Rules that Intermediaries"shall act within thirty six hours and where applicable, work with user or owner of such information to disable such information that is in contravention of sub-rule (2)", by the term "act" they meant that the Intermediary "shall respond or acknowledge to the complainant within thirty six hours of receiving the complaint/grievances about any such information as mentioned in sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 and initiate appropriate action as per law." There's an additional clarification, which is - from what I remember - not contained in the rules, and says that "the Grievance Officer of the intermediary shall redress such complaints promptly but in any case within one month from the date of receipt of complaint in accordance with sub-rule (11) of Rule 3." This was the clarification that was given to the Parliamentary Committee on Subordinate Legislation (the IT Rules are a subordinate legislation), and in opinion, this doesn't change the status of the IT Rules. What's missing? Changes to terms, to bring in specificity, increase transparency, establish a recourse, and limit the actions of intermediaries. We've explained these in detail here. The first reaction of most intermediaries which receive a complaint will be to…
- Inside an industry body’s alleged draft voluntary code of ethics for online real money gaming companies December 2, 2023
- India’s Consumer Protection Authority Notifies Guidelines For Dark Patterns, What’s New? December 1, 2023
- Tata Consultancy Services to pay $210 million in a trade secret row in the US December 1, 2023
- Indian Government Approves Scheme To Provide Drones To 15,000 Women Self Help Groups December 1, 2023
- Google agrees to pay news publishers in Canada December 1, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
Factors like Indus not charging developers any commission for in-app payments and antitrust orders issued by India's competition regulator against Google could contribute to...
Is open-sourcing of AI, and the use cases that come with it, a good starting point to discuss the responsibility and liability of AI?...
RBI Deputy Governor Rabi Shankar called for self-regulation in the fintech sector, but here's why we disagree with his stance.
Straw man fallacy: IT Ministers’ defence of government exemptions in data protection law misses the point
Both the IT Minister and the IT Minister of State have chosen to avoid the actual concerns raised, and have instead defended against lesser...
The Central Board of Film Certification found power outside the Cinematograph Act and came to be known as the Censor Board. Are OTT self-regulating...
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...