The Indian Supreme Court has put a stay on Telecom tribunal, Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) order which had quashed the TRAI's directive of limiting the number of SMS to 200 per day, per SIM, according to a PTI report (via The Times Of India). This essentially means that the TRAI can impose a limit on the number of messages a user sends from one SIM card, till the Court vacates the stay. We were not able to locate the exact document which mentions the stay order but there is a record on the Supreme Court's website related to the case that lists Aditya Thackeray as a respondent, and mentions the status of the case as 'Pending'. Note that there was a separate petition filed in the Delhi High Court filed by Anil Kumar, secretary of an NGO, Telecom Watchdog in December 2011, following which, the Court had removed the 200 SMS/day limit, saying that the SMS spam guidelines infringe the freedom of speech of the citizens, and the conditions imposed upon citizens were not reasonable, in July 2012. Note that the TRAI has already done away with the daily SMS limit and subscribers are now free to send SMSs beyond 100 in a day, however, it had directed that all SMSs sent beyond one hundred SMS per day per SIM, shall be charged at a rate not lower than fifty paise. So we're not sure if the stay means that the daily limit of 200 SMS/day will be effective again, or whether it's upto the…
- MediaNama Daily: It’s not you, it’s your data January 28, 2023
- Why is Google not fully complying with India’s orders, MapmyIndia CEO asks January 27, 2023
- Unique Identification Authority of India working on age verification through e-KYC January 27, 2023
- Views: Why India’s “indigenous” smartphone operating system BharOS is overhyped January 27, 2023
- Here’s why Twitter employees’ access to its ‘God Mode’ function is a problem January 27, 2023
MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.
India's smartphone operating system BharOS has received much buzz in the media lately, but does it really merit this attention?
After using the Mapples app as his default navigation app for a week, Sarvesh draws a comparison between Google Maps and Mapples
The regulatory ambivalence around an instrument so essential to facilitate data exchange – the CM framework – is disconcerting for several reasons.
The provisions around grievance redressal in the Data Protection Bill "stands to be dangerously sparse and nugatory on various counts."
Please subscribe to MediaNama. Don't share prints and PDFs.
You May Also Like
Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...
135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...
Twitter takes down tweets from MP, MLA, editor criticising handling of pandemic upon government request
By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...