wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Sibal Defends IT Act Section 66A In Parliament: Notes

Update: MP P. Rajeeve has moved a motion on repealing Section 66A, and the debate is expected to take place at 2:30 pm today. We’ll update, unless Parliament gets disrupted and no work gets done.

Earlier: Notes from a debate during the Question Hour in the Rajya Sabha on section 66A, of which we caught some parts. Some parts of the notes below are paraphrased:

Rajeev Chandrasekhar: Sibal would be in a minority if he considers section 66A to be in line with the constitution of India. Phrases like ‘Grossly harmful’ etc are being misused – it’s not just the case the police is misusing it, but it is the act itself which is an issue.
Sibal: There were issues and concerns of Phishing, morphing, an expert committee was set up, and then the reform of the act was taken forward. When the matter went to the standing committee, the government’s position was that it should be a non cognizable offence, with 2 years. The standing committee said the government was being soft and it should be a cognizable offence. The member (Chandrasekhar) was a member of that committee. There are statutes all over the world – the UK Communications Act 2003 states that a personal is liable if a personal sends a message which is grossly offensive, of a menacing character or indecent. (Sibal reads a similar provision from the US act, saying it’s much wider, an Australian court as well). Our legislation is in line with other legislation. However, our democracy cherishes fundamental rights. Consider that many times messages are sent which cause enormous disruption, like in Kokhrajhar (Ed: not sure if this is the place).
Balbir Punj: Section 66A has been misused. Will the minister tell us the cases of misuse, statewise, and what remedial action has been taken. We have been hearing about it being misused in Maharashtra. Two teachers in J&K were also harassed and sacked. What are the steps that the central government has taken to address that?
Sibal: I never conceded that there has been rampant misuse of this. I have said that there has been misuse, but no rampant misuse. There is no case limited to 66A. There are 5 instances, and they cannot suggest a rampant misuse. It is the state government which must take note of the act. If the state government misuses the act, it must be taken up in court.
P.Rajeeve: This is not for social media, it is meant for mails written continuously to harass someone. In Britain, there is an unwritten constitution. You cannot validate the constitutional validity of Indian law through the British or US Law.
Sibal: There is a writ petition in Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of this act. There is another matter in the Allahabad High Court. Let the courts decide. (Cites a recent statement in the UK, pointing out that the executing agencies need to understand the phrase grossly)

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like


From January 15, all landline phones dialling mobile numbers will need to prefix “0” first, the Department of Telecommunications ordered on November 20 and...


The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) will put out a policy soon for the proliferation of public WiFi hotspots, a senior official said. “In the...


Airtel has recommended against redefining broadband from 512Kbps, arguing that this speed is enough for most broadband use in the country. “Throughput speed of...


Three Indians have been appointed as members to the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) for 2021 of the United Nations'(UN) Internet Governance Forum (IGF). The...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to Daily Newsletter

    © 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ