wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Google Got 2319 User Data Requests From Indian Govt Between Jan & June 2012

Between January and June 2012, Google received 2319 requests for disclosure of user data from the Indian government, and it complied with as much as 64% of the requests, the company has revealed as a part of its Global Transparency report.

User information requests

Google received requests for information for 3,467 users/accounts. The company has clarified that this might include multiple requests that ask for data for the same entity or a single request that specifies one or more entities. The company hasn’t revealed the nature of these requests or the exact nature of the data it shared, but the increase (over this six month timeframe) is a jump over the 3,427 requests between July and December 2011 and  2439 requests between January and July 2011.

64% compliance is alarmingly high, and remember that a Google spokesperson had informed MediaNama, that “As per the local criminal laws in India, Google does not inform users of their data being shared with the authorities. As it can be seen as aiding in the destruction of evidence.” In our opinion, ethically, Google should inform users whose data is shared with the government agencies. On its website, Google says that the number of requests for criminal investigations increased year on year, but it clarifies that it ” didn’t necessarily include requests that were addressed to the wrong Google company. We review each request to make sure that it complies with both the spirit and the letter of the law, and we may refuse to produce information or try to narrow the request in some cases.”

Blocking & Removal of Content

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

During the same period (January-June 2012), Google also received 101 requests for removal of 596 items of content, and it only complied with 33% of these requests. The compliance rate has increased over the six month period, as Google had complied with 29% requests during the period July-December  2011. The reasons of requests for removal:

– National Security: 3 items on YouTube requested for removal
– 1 for “Hate Speech” on YouTube
– 75 for “Religious offense”: 6 on Search, 24 on YouTube, 44 on Blogger & 1 on Orkut

There’s a complete list here.

It’s worth noting that the number of requests under “Government Criticism” as a reason have not been mentioned this time. We’re not sure if this was due to Google not receiving such requests or the company deciding to club it under “Other” reasons.

Google had also started reporting removal requests from copyright owners and reporting organizations for removal of content or search results that link to material that infringes copyright. Google received 1 such request on YouTube.

Clearly, the number of requests for removal and for user data is increasing. However, Google’s compliance rate on removal requests has not increased majorly compared to the previous period. Though, the compliance rate on user data disclosure is still high.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Social networks such as Orkut, and Google’s blogging platform are also being monitored. Expect the same to be extended to Twitter and Facebook. India’s Internet Control Rules will worsen the situation, and the number of requests are likely to go up. Remember that what has been listed is only the government requests: with the Internet Control Rules, Google have to entertain requests from people for removing of anything that is grossly harmful, harassing, impacting friendly relations with other nations etc. Read the details here.

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The DSCI's guidelines are patient-centric and act as a data privacy roadmap for healthcare service providers.


In this excerpt from the book, the authors focus on personal data and autocracies. One in particular – Russia.  Autocracies always prioritize information control...


By Jai Vipra, Senior Resident Fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy The use of new technology, including facial recognition technology (FRT) by police...


By Stella Joseph, Prakhil Mishra, and Yash Desai The Government of India circulated proposed amendments to the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 (“E-Commerce Rules”) which...


By Rahul Rai and Shruti Aji Murali A little less than a year since their release, the Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules, 2020 is being amended....

You May Also Like


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ